Food Industry subjects | Dairy products » Adebabay Kebede Belew - Characterization of Milk Production Systems

Characterization of Milk Production Systems, Marketing and On- Farm Evaluation of the Effect of Feed Supplementation on Milk Yield and Milk Composition of Cows at Bure District, Ethiopia A Thesis Submitted to the Department of Animal Science and Technology School of Graduate Studies BAHIR DAR UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN AGRICULTURE (ANIMAL PRODUCTION) By Adebabay Kebede Belew May, 2009 Bahir Dar University APPROVAL SHEET- 1 This is to certify that the thesis entitled “Characterization of Milk Production Systems, Marketing and On-farm Evaluation of Feed Supplementation on Milk Yield and Composition at Bure District Ethiopia”, submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Agriculture with a specialization in Animal Production of the Graduate Program of the Department of Animal Science and Technology, Bahir Dar University. The thesis is a record of original research

carried out by Adebabay Kebede Belew, I.D No (R) 050/2000 under our supervision and no part of the thesis has been submitted for any other degree or diploma. The assistance and the help received during the course of this investigation have been duly acknowledged. Therefore, we recommend that it will be accepted as fulfilling the thesis requirements. FIREW TEGEGNE (PhD) Name of major advisor ZELEKE MEKURIAW (PhD) Name of co-advisor AZAGE TEGEGNE (PhD) Name of co-advisor Date Signature Date Signature Date Signature ii APPROVAL SHEET -2 We, the undersigned, members of the Board of Examiners of M. Sc Thesis Open Defence Examination, have read and evaluated the Thesis prepared by Adebabay Kebede Belew and examined the candidate. This is therefore to certify that the thesis be accepted as fulfilling the Thesis requirement for

the Degree of Master of Science in Agriculture (Animal Production). Date Signature Name of Major Advisor Date Signature Date Signature Date Signature Name of Chair Person Name of Internal Examiner Name of External Examiner iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, I would like to offer lots of thanks to my God, the savour and his Saint Virgin Mary for their compassionated help in all aspects of my life. Special thanks also go to My Advisors Dr. Firew Tegegne, Dr Zeleke Mekuriaw and Dr Azage Tegegne for their keen support, supervision, friendly treatment, critical remarks, encouragement and inspiration from the inception of the study to the final write-up of the thesis. I am deeply grateful and indebted to Amhara Regional

Agricultural Research Institute (ARARI) and Improving Productivity and Market success of Ethiopian Farmers (IPMS) project for sponsoring the research component of the postgraduate study and also for paying my salary during the study leave. In this regard, I also owe my deepest gratitude to Dr. Eshete Dejen, former Livestock Director of the Amhara Regional Agricultural Research Institute (ARARI), and Dr. Yigzaw Desalegn for attaching me to my sponsor project (IPMS) and Ejigitu Menkir for her unreserved help in printing term papers and thesis draft. Ato Ayana Dinberu and Birtukan had also contributed a lot during my entire study period. Many thanks go to Debire birhan Agricultural centre for conducting the feed sample tests. Special gratitude also goes to Mr. Tekeba Eshetie, Centre Manager of Andassa Livestock Research Centre, and Dr. Halima Hassen who were on my side in facilitating all the things what I need and Miss Shewaye Metaket for her willingness and cooperation as a delegate to

receive and hand over my monthly salary on time. My special heartfelt gratitude and deepest appreciation goes to Dr. Hailu Mazengia, for his unreserved moral and material supports through out my study; Mr. Addisu Bitew and Mengiste Taye for their kind help in analysing the on-farm feeding trial data. Many thanks are due to Mr Tadele Habtu for his technical assistance during on-farm urea treatment process and Mr. Simegnaw Tamir, Wondmeneh Mekonen, Kegne Yismaw, Zelalem Kifle and Mesafint Bezabih for their great contribution during the survey. I am also grateful for the rest staff of Andassa Livestock Research Centre, who directly or indirectly helped me during my research work. I extend my special thanks to Mr. Getnet Mekuriaw and Dr Muse H/Melekot that are in the Department of Animal Science and Technology for their continuous assistance during iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS (Continued) the study time that helped me in many aspects. I also owe special gratitude to Mr Getenet Belete, Mr. Boru

Assefa and Hulgize Getnet in the Department of Food Technology and Processing Engineering and Dr. Darsema Gulma and Laike Mariam Teshome in Amhara Regional Animal Health Laboratory for their kind support in milk and california mastitis laboratory test, respectively. The Bure District Office of Agriculture and Rural Development and the development agents working in the study sites, especially Mr. Enchalew, target farmers of Wangedam who allowed their animals for experimentation, are highly appreciated for providing me information important for this work. I am really indebted to Miss Yewoynshet Asnakew and Daniel Tessema from Amhara regional Environmental Protection and Land Administration Authority (EPLUA) for preparing the map plan of Bure district. I am also very grateful to Nile Petroleum Ethiopia and Getu Kitaw for providing me laboratory reagents. My sincere thanks also go to my brother Engineer Ayalew Kebede and my sister Zebu Tegegne whose treatment for the success of my life is

meant more to me than I can ever express. Words fall short to express my adoration to my beloved wife Senait Mekit for her unreserved encouragement to devote my time to my study in the due course of the entire research work. I sincerely thank my class mates Melaku Minale, Tessega Bele, and Teshome Derso for their cooperation and memorable moments during the entire period of my post-graduate study. Last but not least, it would be unfair not to emphasize the role of milk producers of Bure district for spending their precious time and energy, and responding tirelessly despite the lengthy interview. v DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to my beloved mother, Alaminie Tarekegn, whom I lost on 8 October 1995. May God rest her soul in peace! vi STATEMENT OF THE AUTHOR I hereby, declare that this thesis is my bonafide work and that all sources of materials used for this thesis have been duly acknowledged. This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for

an advanced M.Sc degree at Bahir Dar University and is deposited at the university library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. I soberly declare that this thesis is not submitted to any other institution anywhere for the award of any academic degree, diploma, or certificate. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission provided that accurate acknowledgement of the source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the School of Graduate Studies when in his or her judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. Name: Adebabay Kebede Belew Signature: Place: Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar Date of Submission: 25/05/2009 G.C vii BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH The author was born

at Meshenti (satellite town of Bahir Dar Special Zone) on 09-05-1982 G.C He attended his primary and junior secondary education at Meshenti Primary and Junior Secondary School from 1987-1993 G.C The Author had also attended his secondary School from 1994-1998 G.C at Bahir Dar Tana Haik Comprehensive Secondary School. Then he joined Mekelle University (the then Mekelle University College) in 1999 G.C and was awarded BSc degree in Animal and Range Sciences in 2003 G.C In 2004, he was employed as a Junior Instructor at Nedjo Agricultural Technical Vocational Educational and Training College. After 7 months of service there, he has been employed in Amhara Agricultural Research Institute, Andassa Livestock Research Centre, as a Junior Researcher and has worked until 2007 as Assistant Researcher. Finally, after four years of working experience he joined Bahir Dar University to pursue his graduate studies in Animal Production. viii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ADF Acid Detergent Fiber AFC

Age at First Calving AFS Age at First Service AI Artificial Insemination ANOVA Analysis of Variance ANRS Amhara National Regional State BOFED Bureau of Finance and Economic Development CI Calving Interval CP Crude Protein CSA Central Statistical Authority DM Dry Matter ESAP Ethiopian Society of Animal Production ETB Ethiopian Birr FAO Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations GDP Gross Domestic Product ILCA International Livestock Research Center for Africa ILRI International Livestock Research Institute ix LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS (Continued) IPMS Improving Productivity and Market Success of Ethiopian Farmers NGOs Non Governmental Organizations NC Noug seed cake NDF Neutral Detergent fiber NSC Number of Service per Conception OM Organic Matter PA Peasant Association RCBD Randomized Complete Block Design SAS Statistical Analysis System SDDP Smallholder Milk Development Project SNF Solids-Not-Fat SPSS Statistical

Package for Social Sciences TDN Total Digestible Nutrients TLU Tropical Livestock Unit TS Total Solids TWS Treated Wheat Straw UTWS Untreated Wheat Straw x LIST OF TABLES page Table 1. On-station milk production performance of indigenous cattle in Ethiopia 12 Table 2. On-station age at first calving of cattle in the tropics 13 Table 3. On-station reported calving intervals of milk cattle in Ethiopia 14 Table 4. On-station reported number of services per conception for cattle in Ethiopia 14 Table 5. Experimental treatments 26 Table 6. Age structure of respondent households in Bure district 33 Table 7 Educational status of sample respondents in Bure district . 34 Table 8. Land holding of respondent households in the study area 35 Table 9. Herd structure and composition per household in Bure district 36 Table 10. Percent distribution of reasons of sample respondents for not having access to credit services in Bure district. 37 Table 11. Major sources of information

for milk production in Bure district 38 Table 12. Purpose of keeping livestock in Bure district 39 Table 13. Share of responsibilities in cattle husbandry among family members in Bure district . 40 Table 14. Watering frequency of local and cross bred cows and calves in Bure district 42 Table 15. Cattle housing and facilities in the barn in Bure district 43 Table 16. Reported daily milk yield of cows in Bure district 47 Table 17. Reported number of crossbred cattle by sample respondents 48 Table 18. Major constraints for access to artificial insemination in Bure district 49 Table 19. Reported indigenous ecto-parasite controlling mechanisms in Bure district 50 Table 20. Reported shelf life of milk products in Bure district 51 Table 21. Medicinal value of milk products in Bure district 52 Table 22. Percent of milk product users of Bure district by rank 53 Table 23. Reported milk & butter buyers, mode of payment and milk outlet in Bure district . 57 Table 24. Price of milk

and butter and distance to market points in Bure district 58 xi LIST OF TABLES (Continued) Page Table 25. Constraints of milk production 60 Table 26. Milk and butter marketing constraints 61 Table 27. Chemical composition, in-vitro organic matter digestibility and estimated metabolizable energy of experimental feeds. 63 Table 28. Dry matter and nutrients intake (g/day) from supplemented feeds by lactating local cows grazed on natural pasture . 64 Table 29. Effect of feed supplementation on body weight changes of local cows 65 Table 30. Milk yield and milk composition from lactating local cows fed experimental feeds . 66 Table 31. Economic evaluation of experimental feeds fed to lactating local milk cows 71 xii LIST OF TABLES IN THE APPENDICES Appendix Page Appendix 1 Table 1. Mean chemical composition of milk from respective treatments 85 Appendix 1 Table 2. ANOVA procedure for mean milk yield of experimental cows 85 Appendix 1 Table 3. ANOVA procedures for private

pasture land holdings among sampled kebeles of Bure district . 85 Appendix 1 Table 4. DMI correlations with milk yield, composition & weight change 86 xiii LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page Figure 1. Projected geographical location map of Bure district 24 Figure 2. Lactation curve of cows fed on experimental diets 67 Figure 3. Protein composition of milk samples taken at fortnight intervals 67 Figure 4. Fat composition of milk samples taken at fortnight intervals 68 Figure 5. Total solids composition of milk samples taken at fortnight intervals 69 Figure 6. Solids-not-fat content of milk samples 69 Figure 7. Ash composition of milk samples taken at fortnight intervals 70 Figure 8. Feeding crossbred cattle at Bure town (left); local cattle grazing maize stover aftermaths at Wangedam kebele (right) of Bure district . 86 Figure 9. Night shelters at Alefa kebele/left/ and Bure town/right/ of Bure district 87 Figure 10. Feeding trough and watering equipments used by milk

producers of Bure district . 87 Figure 11. Communal grazing land at Bekotabo kebele (left) and Alefa kebele (right) of Bure district . 88 Figure 12. Maize stover conservation practice and pumpkin as livestock feed at Bekotabo kebele of Bure district . 88 Figure 13. Transporting hay to homestead at Wangedam (left); hay stacked at Bure town (right) in Bure district . 89 Figure 14. Cattle trekking to watering points at Wundigi (left); watering of cattle at Bure town (right) in Bure district . 89 Figure 15. Woman milk producer at Fetam-Sentom (left); calves housed at Bure town (right) of Bure district . 89 Figure 16. Natural (Bull) service at Alefa kebele/left/; local Bull at Bure town/right/ of Bure district . 90 Figure 17: Milk equipment cleaning and sun drying in Bure district . 90 Figure 18. Churner at Bure Damot Cooperative (left); churning at Bekotabo Kebele (right) of Bure district . 90 xiv TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS (Continued). v LIST OF

ABBREVIATIONS . ix LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS (Continued) . x LIST OF TABLES . xi LIST OF TABLES IN THE APPENDICES. xiii LIST OF FIGURES . xiv LIST OF FIGURES . xiv TABLE OF CONTENTS . xv TABLE OF CONTENTS . xv ABSTRACT. xviii 1. INTRODUCTION 2 2. LITERATURE REVIEW 5 2.1 Milk Production Systems in Ethiopia 5 2.2 Milk Marketing Systems in Ethiopia 7 2.21 Formal versus informal milk marketing systems 7 2.22 Dairy marketing channels and outlets 8 2.23 Demand for milk and milk products in Ethiopia 9 2.3 Consumption and Utilization of Milk Products in Ethiopia 10 2.4 Processing of Milk Products in Ethiopia 11 2.5 Productivity of Milk Cattle in Ethiopia 12 2.61 Milk yield and lactation length 12 2.62 Age at first service 13 2.63 Age at first calving 13 2.64 Calving interval 13 2.65 Number of services per conception 14 2.6 Factors Affecting Milk Yield and Composition 15 2.7 The Role of Nutrition on Animal Productivity 16 2.8 Nutrient Requirements of cattle 18 2.9 Feed Related

Constraints of Livestock Production 19 2.10 Priorities and Strategies for Feed Resources Development 19 2.101Matching livestock production systems to available feed resources 20 xv TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) 2.102 Supplementation . 20 2.103 Increasing digestibility and nutritive value of crop residues 21 3. MATERIALS AND METHODS 22 3.1 Location and description of the study area 22 3.2 Milk Production and Marketing Systems Survey 25 3.3 On-Farm Evaluation of Feed Supplementation on Milk Yield and Composition 25 3.31 Experimental design and treatments 25 3.32 Experimental animals and feeding management 26 3.33 Experimental feeds 27 3.34 Sampling and chemical analysis 27 3.35 Partial budget analysis 30 3.36 Statistical analysis 30 4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 31 4.1 Milk Production Systems of Bure district 31 4.11 Rural small-holder milk production system 31 4.12 Peri-urban milk production system 31 4.13 Urban milk production system 32 4.2 Socio-economic

Characteristics of Households 32 4.21 Household characteristics 32 4.22 Land holding and land use pattern 34 4.23 Livestock holding 35 4.24 Involvement of sample respondents in non-farm activities 36 4.25 Availability of credits 37 4.26 Milk production extension service 37 4.3 Husbandry Practices 39 4.31 Purpose of keeping cattle 39 4.32 Labour use and cattle husbandry 39 4.33 Feeds and feeding 40 4.34 Cattle housing practices in Bure district 43 4.35 Calf rearing 44 4.4 Reproductive and Productive Performance of Cows 45 4.51 Age at first service 45 xvi TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) 4.52 Age at first calving 45 4.53 Number of service per conception 45 4.54 Calving Interval 46 4.55 Lactation length and average milk yield of local and crossbred cows 46 4.55 Breed and breeding practices 47 4.5 Cattle Diseases 49 4.6 Handling Practices of Milk and Milk Utensils 51 4.61 Milking and milk handling practices 51 4.62 Facilities used for storage and processing of milk

products 52 4.7 Consumption and utilization of milk Products 53 4.8 Marketing of Milk and Butter at Bure district 55 4.81 Marketing systems 55 4.82 Milk marketing channels and chains 55 4.83 Determinants of price, demand and supply of milk products 57 4.9 Constraints of Milk production, Processing and Marketing in Bure district 58 4.91 Milk production constraints 59 4.92 Milk and butter marketing constraints 60 4.10 Bure Damot Milk Cooperative 61 4.11 Effect of Feed Supplementation on Milk Yield and Composition of local cows 62 4.111 Chemical composition and in-vitro organic matter digestibility of treatment feeds . 62 4.112 Dry matter and nutrient intake . 63 4.113 Body weight change of cows 64 4.114 Milk yield and composition 65 4.114 Economic evaluation of treatment feeds 70 4.115 Farmers perception 72 5.CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 73 6. REFERENCES 74 7. APPENDICES 84 xvii Characterization of Milk Production Systems, Marketing and On- Farm Evaluation of

the Effect of Feed Supplementation on Milk Yield and Composition at Bure district, Ethiopia By Adebabay Kebede1, Firew Tegegne (Dr.)2, Zeleke Mekuriaw (Dr)3, and Azage Tegegne (Dr)4 1, 2, 3 Bahir Dar University, 4International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) ABSTRACT The study was conducted in Bure District of the Amhara National Regional State (ANRS) with objectives of characterizing the milk production & marketing systems and evaluating the effect of feed supplementation on milk yield & milk composition of local cows. A single-visitmultiple-subject survey was used to collect data on milk production & marketing systems A total of 181 milk households were individually interviewed. On-farm feeding trial was conducted on twenty lactating cows of uniform parity and stage of lactation using a Randomized Complete Block Design (5 treatments & 4 replications). Average body weight and initial milk yield of cows were 231.7±367 kg & 108±011 kg/cow/day respectively

The treatment groups included grazing (T1), noug seed cake (T2), adlib urea treated wheat straw (T3), noug seed cake+ adlib urea treated wheat straw (T4) and concentrate comprising 74% maize grain+25% noug seed cake +1% salt (T5). From the survey, rural small-holder, periurban, and urban milk production systems were identified Milk and butter were found to be marketed mainly through informal marketing systems. Indigenous and Fogera-Friesian crossbreds were the dominant cattle breeds. The major livestock feed resources are natural pasture, crop residues and aftermaths. Trypanosomiasis, pasteurolosis, anthrax and black leg were the major reported cattle diseases. The main problems of milk production & marketing were lack of feed, disease outbreak, lack of improved cattle breeds and distance to marketing points. The on-farm feeding trial result showed a significant difference (P<005) between control and supplemented group in terms of increased milk yield, milk-fat and total solids

while treatment effects were not-significantly different (p>0.05), for increased milk protein, solids-not-fat and ash contents. The highest and the lowest milk yield per day was recorded for cows fed urea treated wheat straw and the control group, respectively. The intervention diets increased the net profit/cow/day by ETB 3.40 (T2), 633 (T3), 358 (T4), and 384(T5) over the control (T1). In general, despite the untapped milk potential of the district, the existing milk production (mainly extensive) & marketing (mainly informal) systems are found to be interwoven by many constraints. Urea treated wheat straw supplementation improved milk yield, weight gain and economic return. Therefore, further works are needed in areas of milk nutrition, health, product marketing, input delivery and services and scaling up the feeding package developed in this study considering the respective milk production systems to capitalize the market oriented milk industry in the district. Key words:

Bure district, milk composition, milk marketing, milk production, milk supplementation yield xviii xix 1. INTRODUCTION Ethiopia’s stricken economy is based on subsistence agriculture accounting for almost half of the gross domestic product (GDP), 60% of exports, and 80% of total employment (Exxun, 2008). Livestock production contributes 30-35% of the GDP and more than 85% of farm cash income. In this respect, milk production is playing a vital role in the livelihoods of the people of Ethiopia (Belete, 2006). The sub-sector also accounts for 19% to the export earnings (BoFED, 2006). Given the considerable potential for increasing smallholder income and employment generation from high-value milk products, development of the milk sector in Ethiopia can contribute significantly to poverty alleviation and improved nutrition in the country (Mohamed et al., 2004) Demand for livestock and livestock products including meat, milk and eggs are soaring in Ethiopia (Mohamed et al.

2004) In response to that, the world’s livestock sector is growing at unprecedented rate, and Ethiopia is no exception. Especially, since 1993, the milk sector has shown progress in Ethiopia. Total milk production grew at an estimated rate of 3% as compared to 1.8% during the period of 1975-1992, thus ending the long-time trend of declining per capita milk production in the country. The milk sector in Ethiopia is expected to continue growing over the next one to two decades given the huge potential for milk development in the country due to the expected growth in income, increased urbanization, and improved policy environment. In Ethiopia, the human and animal populations are very much affected by nutritional problems, primarily due to lack of food of high nutritional value. Therefore, to solve this problem and to ameliorate the nutritional status of the population, measures should be taken to improve animal production so as to ensure better supply of animal protein of high nutritive

value (Ashebir, 1992). In this regard, milk is among livestock products whose demand continues to increase and plays a very important role in feeding the rural and urban population of Ethiopia. According to Azage et al (2001), in order to meet the growing demand for milk in the country, milk production has to grow at least at a rate of 4% per annum which in turn entails design of appropriate and sustainable milk development strategies based on socio-economic, institutional and agro-ecological 2 circumstances that build on the demand of consumers and the needs and opportunities of producers. In Amhara National Regional State (ANRS), agriculture remains to be the dominant economic sector. Structurally, on average from 1999-2005 it accounted for 58% of the region’s GDP and 89% of the population derives its livelihoods from agriculture and allied activities. The regional livestock population accounts for 29% of the country’s livestock population. Livestock contributes 22% from

agriculture and 125% from total GDP in the region (BoFED, 2005). According to BoFED (2006), the livestock resources have great contribution in improving the nutritional status of the people. Despite huge potential in the region, livestock productivity is low. For instance, the daily milk yield per cow is 1.2 litres in 234 days of lactation period in Western Gojjam Zone, resulting in an estimated milk production of 46,710,335 litres per lactation for all lactating cows in the zone (CSA, 2005). Milk production is mainly from indigenous cattle breeds, which are kept by about half a million smallholder farming households of the region (Ibid). Bure is one of the 15 and 106 districts of West Gojjam Adminstrative Zone and Amhara National Regional State, respectively. It is one of the pilot learning sites of Improving Productivity and Market Success (IPMS) of Ethiopian Farmers Project which is currently working in improving the productivity and marketing success of Ethiopian farmers through

knowledge management approach. This district is one of the consistently surplus agricultural products producer districts of Amhara region (Yigzaw and Kahsay, 2007). It is believed to have high potential for milk development. According to Yigzaw and Kahsay (2007), milk production has been identified by the farmers as a priority commodity in the district. Since the inception of IPMS project the farmers are becoming more motivated in milk production. There is also an increasing demand for milk as a result of urbanization and increasing population growth. Small scale maize stover based milk farming is the predominant production system in the highlands of Bure (Birhanu et al., 2007) Among the many problems faced by these milk farms, scarcity of feed ingredients and their high prices are considered to be of major importance. In Bure district, the increasing pressure on land to grow food crops and the ever expanding human population has resulted in a reduction in grazing land. In this

district wheat straw was not efficiently used by livestock 3 owners. The farmers don’t collect and store it for feed of dry season; rather they used to burn it. Because of its course nature they regard it as the cause of coughing for their animals, even though various literatures confirmed that wheat straw nutrient content can be improved through urea treatment. Besides, little is known about the existing milk production and marketing systems, and promising feeding package for improved milk production is not yet developed for local breeds in the district. In order to design relevant milk development strategy in the area, there is a need for smallholder farmers to be aware of the most efficient combination of roughages and concentrates for year round production and to characterize the existing milk production and marketing system. Assessment of existing milk cooperatives and identifying the challenges and opportunities for the success of the milk enterprises in the district is

also crucial. Besides, milk product marketing study is essential to provide vital and valid information on the operation and efficiency of milk product marketing system for effective research, planning and policy formulation. This study therefore was designed to contribute in filling the information gap by investigating the milk and butter marketing chains and factors affecting milk supply in Bure district, Ethiopia. Thus, the objectives of this study were: 1. To characterize the milk production and marketing systems and prioritize constraints and opportunities of milk production and marketing in Bure district. 2. To evaluate the effect of urea treated wheat straw and concentrate (maize grain and noug seed cake mixture) supplementation on milk yield and composition of local cows 3. To evaluate the economic feasibility of urea treated wheat straw and concentrate supplementation on milk yield and composition of local cows 4 2. LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 Milk Production Systems in

Ethiopia In the highland areas, agricultural production system is predominantly smallholder mixed farming, with crop and livestock husbandry typically practiced within same management unit. Among the systems, milk production system is the most biologically efficient system that converts large quantities of roughage, the most abundant feed in the tropics, to milk, the most nutritious food known to man (Belete, 2006). Milk production systems in Ethiopia may be classified into two broad categories viz: commercial system which produces milk mainly for market and subsistence systems which produce milk mainly to meet household needs for milk products (Azage et al., 2003) The commercial system generally operates in urban and peri-urban areas with or without holdings of land for feed production. Whereas, the rural milk production system is part of the subsistence farming system and includes pastoralists, agro pastoralists, and mixed crop-livestock producers. Specifically, they are classified

into four major systems These are pastoralist, the highland smallholder, urban and peri-urban and intensive milk production systems. Pastoralist milk production system is a system mainly operating in the rangelands where the peoples involved follow animal-based life styles which requires them to move from place to place seasonally based on feed and water availability. Even though information on both absolute numbers and distribution vary, it is estimated that about 30% of the livestock populations are found in the pastoral areas (Belete, 2006). The pastoralist livestock production system, which supports an estimated 10% of the human population, covers 5060% of the total area mostly lying at altitudes ranging from below 1500 m above sea level. Pastoralism is the major system of milk production in the lowland areas. However, because of the rainfall pattern and related shortage of feed availability, milk production is low and highly seasonal and range condition dependent (Zegeye, 2003;

Ketema and Tsehay, 2004). Pastoralists typically rely on milk for food and also use animals to save wealth. This system is not market oriented and most of the milk produced in this system is 5 retained for home consumption. The level of milk surplus is determined by the demand for milk by the household and its neighbours, the potential to produce milk in terms of herd size, production season, and access to a nearby market (Getachew, 2003). The surplus is mainly processed using traditional technologies and the processed milk products such as butter, ghee, cottage cheese and sour milk are usually marketed through the informal market channel after the households satisfy their needs (Tsehay, 2001). The highland smallholder milk production is found in the central part of Ethiopia where milking is nearly part of subsistence, smallholder mixed crop and livestock farming (Sintayehu et al. 2008) The smallholder milk production system is dominated by subsistence farming (Belete, 2006 and

Asaminew, 2007). In this system, all feed requirement is derived from native pasture and a balance comes from crop residues and stubble grazing. Cattle are the main source of milk even though they are kept primarily as draught power source with very little or no consideration given to improving their milk production capabilities (Zegeye, 2003). About 93% of the total milk production in Ethiopia is produced by the smallholder milk farmers living in the villages and exercising, in most instances, traditional milking (Tsehay, 1998). Urban and peri-urban milk farming system is concentrated in and around major cities, and towns characterized by a high demand for milk. This system has been developed in response to the fast growing demand for milk and milk products around urban centres (Asaminew, 2007). The system is estimated to consist of 5,167 small, medium and large milk farms, with about 71% of the producers selling milk directly to consumers (Tsehay, 2001). The peri-urban milk

production system includes most of the improved milk stocks (Ahmed et al., 2003) In urban and peri-urban milk production system, the main feed resources are agro-industrial by-products. The total milk production from this system accounts to 34.649 million litres /annum Of this total, 73% is sold, 10% is left for household consumption, 9.4% goes to calves and 76% is processed mainly into butter and ayib (Azage and Alemu, 1998). The most specialized and high-tech system is intensive milk production system. It is practiced by state sector and very few individuals on commercial basis. These are concentrated in and around Addis Ababa. Urban, peri-urban and intensive systems account 2% of the total milk production of the country (Belete, 2006). 6 2.2 Milk Marketing Systems in Ethiopia According to Winrock (1989), marketing includes all activities performed in moving commodities from the producer to the consumer. It also includes all the exchange activities of buying and selling; all the

physical activities performed to give the commodity increased utility; and all the auxiliary activities such as financing, risk bearing and disseminating information to participants in the marketing process. It involves the transfer of ownership of products through buying, selling, pricing, and renting and physical movement as well as transformation of the commodity into more usable forms through transportation, handling, storage, processing and packaging. Therefore, marketing involves sales, locations, sellers, buyers and transactions (Sintayehu et al, 2008). A marketing system includes all activities involved in the flow of goods from the point of initial production to the ultimate consumer. It involves processing raw materials into final products and then distributing them to the consumer (Winrock, 1989). 2.21 Formal versus informal milk marketing systems Milk marketing is an incentive for farmers to improve production. It stimulates production, raise milk farmers’ income and

living standards and create employment in rural areas (Asaminew, 2007). Provision of improved and sustainable milk marketing arrangements in villages is therefore important in the aspiration for advancement of the sector. The Ethiopian milk marketing system is not well developed. This can be reflected from the fact that only 5% of milk produced in rural areas is marketed as liquid milk. This has resulted in difficulties of marketing of fresh milk where infrastructure especially transportation facilities are extremely limited and market channels have not been developed. In the absence of an organized rural fresh milk market, marketing in any volume is restricted to the urban and peri-urban areas (Getachew, 2003). Mohamed et al. (2004) reported that milk products in Ethiopia are channelled to consumers through both formal and informal milk marketing systems. The informal market involves direct delivery of fresh milk by producers to consumers in the immediate 7 neighbourhood and sale

to itinerant traders or individuals in nearby towns (Debrah and Berhanu, 1991). In the informal market, milk may pass from producers to consumers directly or it may pass through two or more market agents. The informal system is characterized by no licensing requirement to operate, low cost of operations, high producer price compared to formal market and no regulation of operations. The term ‘informal’ is often used to describe marketing systems in which governments do not intervene substantially in marketing. In Ethiopia, fresh milk sales by smallholder farmers are important only when they are close to formal milk marketing facilities such as government enterprises or dairy cooperatives (Holloway et al., 2000) Farmers far from such formal marketing outlets instead prefer to produce other milk products such as cooking butter and cottage cheese. In fact, the vast majority of milk produced outside urban centres in Ethiopia is processed into products by the farm household and sold to

traders or other households in local markets (Ibid). 2.22 Dairy marketing channels and outlets Marketing channels are routes through which products pass as they are moved from the farm to the consumer (Winrock, 1989). In any marketing system, various actors participate in marketing of commodities and process of transactions made. These include itinerate /mobile traders, semi-whole sellers, retailers, cooperatives and consumers. Itinerate/mobile traders purchase commodities from nearby market points and sell at business site or residences. Whereas, retailers are market intermediaries such as supper markets, small and large –scale retailers who perform the function of retailing. Semi-whole sellers are important commodity market intermediaries who perform the function of both retailing and whole selling depending on the market conditions. Cooperatives are common form of collective group of producers. They are milk outlets that are potential catalysts in markets by providing bulking and

bargaining services, increase outlet market access and help farmers avoid the hazards of being encumbered with a perishable product with no rural demand. In short, participatory cooperatives are very helpful in overcoming access barriers to assets, information, services, and indeed, to the markets within which smallholders wish to produce high value items (Holloway et al., 2000) Cooperative marketing is based on the premise that a group of producers can achieve better results by 8 combining their efforts and resources than operating separately. The final/destination link in any commodity marketing chain is consumer. Terms related to marketing outlets, marketing channels, and marketing chains are important to describe milk marketing systems (Sintayehu et al, 2008). Marketing outlet is the final market place to deliver the milk product, where it may pass through various channels. A network (combination) of market channels gives rise to the market chain Marketing survey in Hawassa,

Shashemane and Yergalem depicted that milk producers sold milk through different principal marketing channels (Woldemichael, 2008). These included: • Producer-consumer (P-C) channel- involves direct sales to individual consumers accounting for 21%, 4.7% and 237% of total milk marketed per day in Hawassa, Shashemane and Yergalem, respectively. • Producer Retailer Consumer: The channel represents average of 43% of milk marketed per day in the milk shed. This channel represents for 16%, 38% and 76.6% of total milk marketed per day in Hawassa, Shashemane and Yergalem, respectively. • Producer Semi-whole seller Retailer Consumer: This channel was identified to be operational only in Hawassa where milk semi-whole sellers undertake both retailing and wholesaling activities. • Producer Cooperative Retailer Consumer: This channel account for 2.2% and 469% of total milk marketed per day in Hawassa and Shashemane, respectively. • Producer Cooperative Consumer: This channel was

exceptional for Shashemane and Hawassa where milk cooperatives are found and accounts for 0.81% and 1067% of total milk marketed per day in Hawassa and Shashemane, respectively. 2.23 Demand for milk and milk products in Ethiopia According to Mohamed et al. (2004), the milk sector in Ethiopia is expected to continue growing over the next one to two decades given the large potential for milk development in the country, the expected growth in income, increased urbanization, and improved 9 policy environment. Human population in Ethiopia is estimated to grow at 29% per year, while the urban population increases at a rate of 4.4% Therefore, increase in population growth and consumer income in the future is expected to increase liquid milk consumption. A report by ILCA (1993) showed that if demand for fluid milk alone is to be met, production should grow by 4% until the year 2025. This increasing demand for milk and milk products offers great opportunity and potential for the

smallholder milk producer and for the development of milk production and processing industry in the country. Under current situation, the milk production level in the country is not sufficient to meet the existing demand of the rapidly growing population. It can be said that the production of milk does not keep pace with the growing population and the per capita consumption of milk over the years is declining in Ethiopia (Ketema and Tsehay, 2004). Therefore, the potential of small scale milk farmers and organizations in meeting current and future consumer needs is recognized as vital to the development of milking in Ethiopia. The milk industry needs to be optimized through organizing milk production, processing, preservation and marketing in a well coordinated way to increase the quantity and quality of milk and milk products being offered to consumers (Getachew and Gashaw, 2001).With the increasing demand for diverse and quality animal products, prices are bound to escalate unless

production increases proportionally. Bridging the wide gap between demand-supply calls for the designing of appropriate and sustainable milk development strategies based on the specific agro- ecology and felt needs of smallholder farmers. 2.3 Consumption and Utilization of Milk Products in Ethiopia Milk and milk products form part of the diet of many Ethiopians. They consume milk products either fresh or fermented or soured form. Getachew and Gashaw (2001) estimated that 68% of the total milk produced is used for human consumption in the form of fresh milk, butter, cheese and yoghurt. The balance is given to calves and/or wasted in the process. The consumption of milk and milk products varies geographically between the highlands and the lowlands and the level of urbanization (Ahmed et al., 2004) In the lowlands, all segments of the population consume milk products, while in the highlands 10 major consumers primarily include children and some vulnerable groups of women. In

general, various literatures indicated that the per capita consumption of milk in the country and even in ANRS is very low. The per capita milk consumption in Ethiopia is 189 kg per year, which is considerably lower than the average of 29.5 kg per year for sub-Saharan Africa (FAO, 2001a). Milk and milk products have other additional functions besides their nutritional value. Fresh whole milk and butter are considered to neutralize toxins. Women anoint their head with butter which is assumed to have dual functions as hairdressing and to cure headaches (Zelalem and Ledin, 2001). 2.4 Processing of Milk Products in Ethiopia Studies indicate that butter making is an ancient practice that goes back as far as 2000 BC to the time of Egyptian civilization. Butter may have begun at a similar time in Ethiopia The traditional Ethiopian practice is to accumulate the milk for two to three days until it is sour. A clay pot is then used to churn the sour milk Butter is used for cash generation,

cooking traditional Ethiopian dishes, and medicinal and cosmetic purposes (e.g application to the braided hair of the women). In almost all traditional Ethiopian societies, women are responsible for butter making and marketing. In general, husbands or men do not decide what the fate of butter is. In many parts of Ethiopia, smallholder milk processing is based on sour milk. According to Belete (2006), milking frequency in Fogera district under smallholder system is twice per day (in the morning and evening). After milking, the milk is transferred into a smoked clay-pot and kept closed at room temperature. Milk from the evening milk is added to the morning milk and kept until the next morning. The quality of curd formed was visually evaluated and readiness of the curd for churning was determined by the woman household. The churning operation started after stirring the content and transferring to another smoked clay pot. The clay pot is agitated until butter grains are formed The

developed gas is released every 2-3 minutes by opening the top of the churn during the first 10-15 minutes of the churning operation. The churning operation, a back and forth movement, is manually performed in a traditional way. 11 2.5 Productivity of Milk Cattle in Ethiopia Average milk production of indigenous cattle per cow is very low. Milk production potential of indigenous cattle such as Boran, Barca, Arsi and Fogera is low and it ranges from 494-809 kg per lactation (Mukasa-Mugerwa, 1989). For instance, average milk production per cow in Western Gojam Zone is about 1 litre per day, resulting in an estimated milk production of 46,710,335 litres per lactation for all lactating cows (CSA, 2005).Total milk production is further affected by relatively short lactation length, and extended postpartum anoestrus period resulting in lower reproductive efficiency (Ibid). This is basically due to the fact that these animals have been selected primarily for survival trait and possess

well-established adaptive traits to the environment in which they are expected to survive and produce. In general, the reproductive efficiency of a breeding cow is determined by factors like age at first calving, calving interval and number of services per-conception. 2.61 Milk yield and lactation length The lactation milk yield and days of lactation in indigenous cattle in Ethiopia are reported by a number of studies ( Table 1). The milk production potential of indigenous breeds of cattle is very low. In addition, milk production potential of temperate breeds in the tropical environments is higher than the indigenous breeds, but this yield is still far below the genetic potential. Table 1. On-station milk production performance of indigenous cattle in Ethiopia Indigenous breed Lactation Source Milk yield (kg) Length Boran 494 155 Beyene and Galal (1982) Horro 559 285 Beyene and Galal (1982) Arsi 809 Barka Fogera 272 a 552 613 a a=first lactation 12 Kiwuwa et al.

(1983) 128 a Goshu (1981) 353 a Goshu (1981) 2.62 Age at first service According to Gidey (2001), age at first service (AFS) is the age at which heifers attain body condition and sexual maturity for accepting service for the first time. AFS signals the beginning of the heifer’s reproduction and production and influences both the productive and reproductive life of the female through its effect on her life time calf crop. 2.63 Age at first calving Age at first calving is the age at which heifers calve for the first time (Gidey, 2001). It is closely related to the rearing intensity, and in a breeding program has impact on generation interval and response to selection. Different works of various authors had shown values of age at first calving estimated for different cattle genotypes in Ethiopia ( Table 2). Table 2. On-station age at first calving of cattle in the tropics Breed AFC(months) Source Boran 45.0 Hailemariam and Kassa (1994) Horro 50.0 McDowell (1971)

Fogera 54.6 Gidey (2001) Highland Zebu 53.0 Mukassa-Mugerwa et al. (1989) Barka 30.3 Goshu (1981) FriesianxZebu(F1) 29.1 Albero (1983) AFC= Age at first calving 2.64 Calving interval Calving interval refers to the period between two consecutive calvings and is a function of days open and gestation length (Kedja, 2007 and Gidey, 2001). Calving interval is probably the best indicator of a cows reproductive efficiency. Estimates of calving interval in zebu cattle range from 12.2 to 266 months (Mukassa-Mugrewa et al, 1989) Various 13 works had also elucidated different values (Table 3) of calving interval for cattle in Ethiopia. Table 3. On-station reported calving intervals of milk cattle in Ethiopia Breed CI (month) Source Horro 12.2 McDowell (1971) Arsi 12.9 Swensson et al. (1981) Boran 15.5 Hailemariam and Kassa (1994) Fogera 18.6 Gidey (2001) Barka 11.8 Goshu (1981) Fogera 14.5 Goshu (1981) Highland zebu 25.0 Mukassa Mugrewa et al. (1989) CI=

calving interval 2.65 Number of services per conception According to Gidey (2001), the number of services per conception is the number of services (natural or artificial), required for successful conception. The number of inseminations required to produce a live calf is one of the most useful parameters of reproductive efficiency which mainly depends on the breeding system used. It is higher under uncontrolled natural breeding than hand-mating and artificial insemination. Usually, according to Mukassa-Mugrewa et al. (1989), values of number of services per conception greater than 2 are regarded as poor. Some other values of number of services per conception estimated by different authors in Ethiopia are also compiled in Table 4. Table 4. On-station reported number of services per conception for cattle in Ethiopia Breed NSC Source Arsi 2.4-26 Swensson I. (1981) Boran 1.81 Hailemariam and kassa (1994) Fogera 1.54 Gidey (2001) Highland zebu 1.74-18 Azage et al (1981) 14

2.6 Factors Affecting Milk Yield and Composition Milk composition and production are the interaction of many elements within the cow and her external environments (O’Connor, 1994). High milk yield of satisfactory composition is the most important factor ensuring high economic returns. If the composition of milk varies widely, its implication is that nutritive value and its availability as a raw material will also vary. Chemical composition of milk is variable and influenced by intrinsic factors like breed, species, parity, stage of lactation; external factors like environmental stress, changes in feeding, etc. However, it is generally accepted that the milkman can alter many of these factors to achieve milk production and increase profit. The major factors affecting milk composition are discussed hereunder. Breeds of milk cattle show obvious differences in their milk composition and yield. Differences among individuals among a breed are often greater than differences within

breeds (O’Connor, 1994) such differences are due to partly genetic and partly to environmental factors. For instance, Jersey breed gives milk of higher fat content than Friesian cattle, while Zebu cows can give milk containing up to 7% fat (O’ Mahony, 1988). The milk from indigenous cows contains 61% fat, 33% protein, 45% lactose and 0.7% ash (Alganesh, 2002) Nutrition has also major effect on milk composition. According to O’Connor (1993), underfeeding reduces the amount milk production, the fat and solids-not-fat (SNF) contents of milk produced. As a general rule, any ration that increases milk production usually reduces the fat percentage of milk. It is also believed that the fat content is influenced more by roughage (fibre) intake and the SNF content can fall if the cow is fed a low energy diet , but it is not greatly influenced by protein deficiency , unless the deficiency is acute (O’Connor, 1994). The fat, lactose and protein contents of milk also vary according to

stage of lactation. In temperate type cows, the fat and SNF percentages tend to be higher in the early weeks of lactation, dropping by the third month then rising again as milk yield gradually declines (O’ Manhony, 1988). The milk immediately after calving contains a very high percentage 15 of total solids (up to 19%) mainly due to the very high fat and milk protein contents (O’ Connor, 1993). A study made by Asaminew (2007) in Mecha and Bahir Dar Zuria indicated that the overall mean fat, protein, total solids, ash and SNF contents of local cows’ milk produced in the study area were 4.71, 325, 1347, 073 and 878%, respectively Whereas Schaar et al. (1981) at Arsi indicated that the percent fat content of milk for Arsi breeds during the first, second and third lactations were 5.73, 580 and 544, respectively, while the values for the Fogera, Borana, Barca, Arsi x Friesian and Arsi x Jersey breeds during their first lactation were 6.15, 602, 576, 45 and 514%, respectively The

age of the cow has slight, but definite effect on the composition of milk. O’ Connor (1994) suggested that as cows grow older, the fat content of their milk decreases by about 0.02 percentage units per lactation while the fall in solid-non-fat is about 004 percentage units. The decrease in SNF content seems to be due to a decline in casein content When milking is done at longer intervals, the yield is also more with a corresponding smaller percentage of fat, whereas milk drawn at short intervals yield smaller quantities with higher amount of fat. The effect of milking interval is mainly on fat percentage rather than the SNF (Rai, 1985). The fat content of milk is usually lower in the morning than in the evening milking, because there is usually a much shorter interval between the morning and evening milking than between the evening and morning milking. Solid-not- fat content varies little even if the intervals between milking vary. 2.7 The Role of Nutrition on Animal Productivity

Three factors, viz. genetic make up; nutrition and management decide the productivity of an animal (Sethumadhavan, 2004). Improvements of genetic make up only contribute up to 30% to production, while the 70% is dependent on nutrition and management. Unfortunately, indigenous animals are low milk producers because of the shortage of nutrition. Poor nutritive values of feeds lower the production capacity and fertility potential of animals. If fed well, 20-25% more milk could be produced from the same livestock (Sethumadhavan, 2004). 16 In Ethiopia animal production systems are primarily based on native pasture and crop residues (Firew, 2007). Crop residues including cereal straws of teff, barley, wheat, oats and cereal stovers from maize, sorghum and millet and haulms from pulse crops including peas, beans, lentils, chick peas and vetch are very important feed resources (Rihirahe, 2001). However, the feed supply is seasonal and the shortage of green grass is one of the major causes

of drastic deterioration of livestock nutrition (Rihirahe, 2001; Firew, 2007). They are inherently low in crude protein, digestibility and intake and are deficient in minerals (Rihirahe, 2001). The lower nutrient contents reduce rumen efficiency, rumen micro-fauna and milk production performance. Lactating cows for example are unable to meet their nutritional requirements i.e they lose weight and body condition during lactation due to high nutrient demand for milk production. Poor nutrition in addition to causing low rates of production and reproduction also increases susceptibility of livestock to diseases and subsequently mortality. Biologically, about two-thirds of the improvement in livestock productivity is often attributed to nutrition since animal production is basically a conversion of feed into animal products. In economic terms, feed cost accounts for about 70% of the total cost of livestock production indicating the feasibility of livestock enterprises is a function of the

type of feed and feeding system (Wambugu, n.d) Livestock production in Ethiopia suffers from feed shortages at all levels. It is estimated that there is a 40% deficit in the national feed balance. This is again aggravated by seasonal availability of forage and crop residues in the highlands and by erratic rainfall in the lowlands. The problem is further exacerbated by the associated poor husbandry practices that lower productivity further. One of the ways to bridge this gap is to chemically treat crop residues, the most suggested method in the tropics (Firew, 2007), and utilize concentrates for supplemental feeding for farm animals. Agro-industrial by-products are fed as supplement to roughage based diets, particularly in livestock production system for milking or peri-urban fattening activities. Concentrates rich in energy are feedstuffs such as grain, brans from different cereals, maize and middlings. Concentrates rich in protein include noug seed cake, linseed cake, cotton seed

cake, brewers’ grains, etc. How much energy and protein a concentrate 17 mixture should contain will depend on the quality of the basal roughage and the level of production. As a rule of thumb, 1 kg good concentrate will increase milk production by 15 kg (SDDP, 1999). Agro-industrial by-products can be utilized by mixing two or more of the ingredients to make concentrate at home or using a single ingredient. They have special value in feeding livestock mainly in urban and peri-urban livestock production systems, as well as in situations where the productive potential of the animals is relatively high and require high nutrient supply. Agro-industrial by-products are rich in energy and/or protein contents or both. They have low fibre content, high digestibility and energy values compared with the other class of feeds. Alemu et al (1991) have also reported more than 35% CP and 5070% in vitro organic matter digestibility (IVOMD) for oil seed cakes and 18-20% CP and more than 80%

IVOMD for flour milling by-products. Therefore, due to their high IVOMD and CP contents, supplementing ruminants fed on low quality feeds with agroindustrial by-products enables them to perform well due to higher nutrient density to correct the nutrient deficiencies in the basal diet. 2.8 Nutrient Requirements of cattle Feed serves many different purposes, including the following: 1. Maintenance: The normal activities of staying alive, breathing, blood circulation, digestive processes, etc., all require nutrients 2. Reproduction: Pregnancy and delivery make demands on the dam which have to be met from her feed, if it is not to lose weight. The foetus increases in size quickly during the last two to three months of gestation, drawing on the body reserves of the dam. 3. Growth: Any growth requires nutrients; during the main period of growth between weaning and attaining the mature body weight, cattle require large quantities of energy and protein. 4. Lactation: Producing milk either for

one or two offspring or for human consumption requires high levels of energy and protein and good access to protein and good access to water. 18 2.9 Feed Related Constraints of Livestock Production There are three aspects of feed problems, namely, the issue of increasing the efficiency with which the available feed is utilized (e.g forages, crop residues, agro-industrial byproducts and non-conventional feeds), and the inability to make maximum use of the limited total feed resources and the seasonal fluctuations in quantity, nutritive value, and water availability. The inability to feed animals adequately throughout the year is the most widespread technical constraint. Much of the available feed resources are utilised to support maintenance requirements of the animals with little surplus left for production. In drier regions, the quantity of forages is often insufficient for the number of livestock carried; dry season feed supply is the paramount problem in Ethiopia. Fore

instance, in the total amount of feed that can be produced in ANRS is only 69.1% and utilization of improved forage seed is practiced only by 9.9% of the farmers in the region (BoFED, 2006). Poor forage quality, that is with low protein and energy content is also a serious problem. Poor quality feed causes low intake rates resulting in low levels of overall production. Crop residues and agro-industrial by-products that could be fed to animals are largely wasted or inefficiently used because infrastructure for transporting, processing and marketing feedstuffs is underdeveloped. 2.10 Priorities and Strategies for Feed Resources Development The feed value of forage that form the basis of ruminant feeding is a function of its nutrient content and digestibility, its palatability (which determines its consumption level) and the associative effects of other feeds (Preston, 1986b). Interplay of these factors determines the effective utilization or feed value of the material. Strategies for

ensuring adequate nutrition of livestock include the following: 1. Matching livestock production systems to available resources 2. Selection of crops and cropping systems that will maximize biomass production and nitrogen fixation and thus minimize use of inputs external to the system. 3. Developing simple processing techniques to optimize the use of different components of crops for different end purpose. 4. Recycling of livestock wastes 19 5. Making more efficient and widespread use of agricultural and industrial byproducts as sources of ruminant feed and incorporation into the production system of non-ruminant species that are well adapted to use of farm resources and byproducts. 2.101 Matching livestock production systems to available feed resources One of the strategies to increase feed availability is through increasing off-take of animals through sale (destocking). The amount of feed available to the remaining animals will increase in the process. Some estimates of the

impact of optimal utilization of feed resources on improvement of the productivity of the sub-sector in the tropics suggest scenarios as high as five-fold improvement in output (Preston and Leng, 1987). 2.102 Supplementation Providing feed supplements and minerals to livestock is important for improved animal performance (Winrock, 1989). A supplement is a semi-concentrated source of one or more nutrients used to improve the nutritional value of a basal feed, e.g, protein supplement, mineral supplement. Ruminant diets based on fibrous feeds are imbalanced as they are deficient in protein, minerals and vitamins; since they are highly lignified their digestibility is low. Both these characteristics keep intake and productivity low The major constraint to milk production on diets based on crop residues appears to be insufficient glycogenic compounds to provide the glucose for lactose synthesis and for oxidation to provide the NADPH for synthesis of fatty acids (Preston, 1986). Therefore,

in order to improve milk production levels, energy inputs such as concentrate feeds have to be considered essential for any dairy enterprise, even for those based on dual purpose systems, since reduced intake of energy by animals consuming low quality forages is the principal cause of low milk production (Getu, 2008). Recent researches has generally shown that the inclusion of by-pass nutrients at a low rate in the diets is efficient, even though, they come generally from rather expensive feeds which are either in demand for human nutrition (cereals) or whose primary products exported for foreign exchange (oil-cakes) (Preston, 1986a). 20 2.103 Increasing digestibility and nutritive value of crop residues Low-quality forages are a major component of ruminant diets in the tropics. Thus, much progress can be made by improving the roughage component of the ration. The characteristic feature of tropical roughages is their slow rate of microbial breakdown in the rumen (Preston, 1986b)

with the result that much of the nutrients of the feed are voided in the faeces. The slow rate of breakdown also results in reduced outflow rate of feed residues from the rumen which consequently depresses feed intake (Ibid). At present, the main treatment methods for forages such as cereal straws are mechanical (e.g grinding), physical (e.g temperature and pressure treatment) and a range of chemical treatments of which sodium hydroxide or ammonia are among the most successful. For instance, in a study conducted in Kuyu district of North Shewa Zone, Ethiopia doubled the CP content from 4.3 to 89% (increased by 107%) due to retention of ammonia N (binding of ammonia) to the straw ( Mesfin et al., 2009) Similarly, there was also an increase in IVOMD by 7.9% (from 532 to 574%) when teff straw was treated with urea which was due to better solubilization of hemicellulose and swelling of cellulose during urea ammonia treatment. Regarding the cell wall constituents, urea treatment reduced the

NDF, ADF and hemicellulose contents of teff straw by 6.04%, 876% and 26.69%, respectively which was due to binding of ammonia with the straw and also due to solubilization of hemicellulose by the action of ammonia evolved from urea. In an experiment conducted by Cottyn and De Boever (1988), treatment wheat straw showed an increment CP and DCP of wheat straw from 3.4% - 85% and 01%-32%, respectively Moreover, improvement in DM digestibility of urea treated wheat strawby10%-15% has been achieved (Sundstøl, 1978). According to Getu (2008), Urea treatment is technically effective and feasible on-farm technology to improve the nutritive value of fibrous crop residues. 21 3. MATERIALS AND METHODS 3.1 Location and description of the study area Bure district is one of the 15 districts of West Gojjam Adminstrative Zone of the Amhara ANRS (Figure 1). It is one of the consistently surplus producer districts of ANRS (Yigazaw and Kahsay, 2007). The capital of the district, Bure town, is

located 400 km north west of Addis Ababa and 148 km south west of the Amhara Regional State capital, Bahir Dar. The district has 15 km asphalt road, 84 km all weather gravel road and 103 km dry weather road. It is proxy to and connected by all weather roads to east Wollega Zone of Oromia Regional State and Metekel Zone of Benishangul Gumuz Regional State. This has provided Bure district the opportunity to market its agricultural products to different regional states. The availability of relatively higher road density (685 km/1000 km2) has enabled the district to easily access agricultural products and inputs from and into the various peasant associations and market points. Human population of the district is 169,609, of which 143, 854 (85%) live in rural areas. According to Yigzaw and Kahsay (2007), the number of agricultural households, 21, 793, is about eight times higher than the households in the urban areas. This indicates that the livelihoods of most of the district population

are dependent on agriculture. In this regard, Bure district is one of the potential agricultural (livestock and crops) areas of the ANRS. The total area coverage of the district is 72,739 ha of which 46.6% is cultivated Average cultivated area per household is 1.6 ha Currently, the district is subdivided into 22 rural peasant associations and two urban kebeles. Agro-ecologically, it is classified into moist and wet kola(low-land) (10%), wet WoinaDega (mid altitude) (82%) and Wet Dega( highland) (8%). The altitude drops from 2,604 to 713 metres above sea level as one travels from north to south part (Abbay Gorge) of the district, while the opposite holds true for the ambient temperature. The minimum and maximum temperature of the area is 17 0C and 250C, respectively, while, the minimum and the maximum rainfall is, 1386 mm and 1757 mm, respectively. The diverse, agroecology of the area has provided the opportunity to grow diverse crop types and raise different livestock species (Yigzaw

and Kahsay, 2007). 22 The district is also endowed with large number of rivers and springs. Recently, six modern river diversions are constructed and used to irrigate 614 ha of land. Apart from the modern river diversions, a number of rivers are traditionally diverted and being used for irrigation. This indicates the potential of the district for development of improved forages and forage seed multiplication to enhance livestock production and productivity in the area. About 76%, 17% and 5% of the total area is plain, rugged mountains and valleys, respectively. The higher proportion of plain topography of the area shows the potentiality of the area for livestock production in general and for milk production in particular (Yigzaw and Kahsay, 2007). The soil of the area comprises of humic nitosols (63%), eutric vertisols (17%) and eutric cambisols (20%). The crop types of the area include cereals, pulses, oil crops, vegetables, spices and other perennial crops, while the livestock

species which are predominant to the area include cattle, small ruminants, equines, poultry and beehives. According to the Office of Agriculture and Rural Development (2006) report, 71, 924 cattle, 8,294 goats, 15,225 sheep, 47,159 poultry, 6,684 equines, and 13,329 honeybee colonies are found in the district. Cattle and sheep are the major livestock species in the area According to Yigzaw and Kahsay (2007), there is a good motive to expand milk production and productivity in the area. The major livestock feed resources of the area include natural pasture, crop residues, crop aftermaths and improved forages. 23 Figure 1. Projected geographical location map of Bure district 24 3.2 Milk Production and Marketing Systems Survey To characterize the milk production and marketing systems of the study district, preliminary visits were made prior to questionnaire development which is pertinent to the objectives of the study. The questionnaire contained many open-ended questions that

allowed the respondents to express their opinions on various issues are presented in descriptive statistics. Both secondary and primary data sources were used Seven kebeles namely, Wundigi (high-altitude), Bure town (mid-altitude), Wangedam (mid-altitude), Denbun (mid-altitude), Alefa (mid altitude), Fatam-Sentom (low-altitude) and Bekotabo (low-altitude) were selected purposively based on their potential for milk production and variations in agro-ecology. The target sampling population were defined as all households in the study area who owned milk cows and 10% of the households were selected randomly from a list of farmers registered as milk producers of the respective kebeles. For the field survey, the method of data collection was single- visit-multiple-subject survey (ILCA, 1990). Both formal and informal surveys were used to characterize the milk production and marketing systems of the area. Information was gathered from smallholder milk farmers, butter traders, hotels and milk

cooperatives of the area using semi-structured questionnaire. The main themes of the survey, vis, cattle type, number, age and sex of animals; feeds, feeding, reproduction and management; artificial insemination; health and breed improvement practices and challenges, milk and milking practices; available local milk breed productivity and livestock disease incidences of the study area, handling, processing, consumption and marketing of milk and milk products and major constraints and opportunities for milk production and marketing systems were addressed in the questionnaire. 3.3 On-Farm Evaluation of Feed Supplementation on Milk Yield and Composition 3.31 Experimental design and treatments The on-farm feeding trial was conducted at Wangedam kebele in Bure district from 15 March 2009 G.C to 28 April 2009 GC A Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) was used to conduct feeding trials. The feeding experiment included five treatments and 25 four blocks. The experimental animals were

allotted to one of the five dietary treatments based on their initial body weight given below. Table 5. Experimental treatments Description Treatments Feeding level T1 Grazing (control) - T2 Control + NC 0.25 kg/Kg of milk yield T3 Control + UTWS ad lib T4 Control + NC + UTWS 0.25kg/kg of milk-02*0.25kg/kg of milk T5 Control+ Concentrate* 0.25 kg/Kg of milk yield NC=Noug seed cake; UTWS=urea treated wheat straw; *74% maize grain+ 24% NC + 1% salt. 3.32 Experimental animals and feeding management A total of 20 lactating cows (owned by 20 farmers) of uniform parity and stage of lactation were selected purposively for the feeding trial. Cows were housed under traditional housing type. Average body weight of the selected cows was 2317±367 kg ranging from 175 to 274 kg with an average initial milk yield of 1.08±011 kg/cow/day ranging from 0.64 to 128 kg/cow/day The cows were tested against mastitis by collecting milk samples from each quarter of the cow’s udder

using California Mastitis Test and dewormed for internal parasites with Zanisol (one bolus per 250 kg body weight) prior to the start of the experiment. The treatment diets were given to the cows individually for a period of 45 days and an adaptation period of 15 days. The initial and final body weights of the cows were estimated using heart girth measurements. The experimental cows were allowed to graze for the whole day and recommended amount of supplements (noug seed cake, concentrate and urea treated wheat straw) of respective treatments were given in two equal portions at 8:00 am and the other half in the afternoon at 8:00 pm each day. The experimental animals were provided with water adlib. Samples of offers from all feed supplements and refusals from only urea treated wheat straw were collected, weighed and 26 bulked for chemical analysis. All the cows were hand milked twice a day (in the morning at 7:00 am and in the evening at 7:00 pm) and milk yield measurements were

taken by using graduated bottles at the start of the experiment and during the entire study period. Noug seed cake and concentrate supplementation was based on milk yield performance of experimental cows. About 025 kg was given per kg of milk yield per day (Holeta Research Centre, 2004 as cited in BOARD, 2005). When noug seed cake was supplemented with urea treated wheat straw; it was supplemented at a level of 0.25 kg per kg of milk - 0.5* 0.25 kg per kg of milk (Mesfin et al, 2009) Urea treated straw offer was adjusted daily by allowing 20% of refusal from previous day’s intake. However, periodic adjustment of concentrate offer was made for each cow as per the actual milk produced per day. Body weight change was recorded at the beginning and end of experiment for each treatment to monitor body weight changes across periods for each dietary treatment. 3.33 Experimental feeds Experimental feeds were selected based on their availability in the study area. Secondary data were used to

formulate concentrate mixtures (Seyoum et al, 2007). Concentrate rations were formulated based on the nutrient requirement of lactating milk cows in the tropics, which is 75% TDN and 17% CP on the average and the fact that most of the Ethiopian dry forages and roughages had a CP content of less than 9% (mean 6.2%) which indicates microbial requirement can hardly be met unless supplemented with protein rich feeds (Yoseph et al, 2003). The concentrate ration was formulated to have 74% of maize grain, 24 % of noug seed cake and 1% salt using Pearson square balancing method. About 100 kg of wheat straw was treated with 5 kg urea (46% N) and about 100 litres of water and ensiled in a pit size of 2m*1m1m for a period of 21 days. 3.34 Sampling and chemical analysis Feed offer from all treatments and refusal from urea treated wheat straw samples were taken daily per cow, bulked on a weekly basis and oven dried at 65o C for 72 hours. 27 Samples were then grounded using Cyclo-Tec sample

mills to pass 1 mm sieve size for proximate and detergent analysis and in vitro digestibility determination. All samples of feed offered and refusals from urea treated wheat straw were analyzed for DM, N (Kjeldahl-N) according to AOAC (1990) procedures. Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) were determined by the methods of Van Soest and Robertson (1985). In vitro organic matter digestibility (IVOMD) of feeds offered and refused were determined using procedures outlined by Tilley and Terry (1963). Metabolizable energy (ME) value was estimated from the percent IVOMD: ME=0.16 (% IVOMD) according to McDonald et al. (2002) Hemicellulose was calculated from the difference between % NDF and % ADF. About 100 ml pooled milk samples from each morning and evening milkings were collected from each experimental cow fortnightly for a period of 45 days. The milk samples were kept in an ice box and delivered to Bahir Dar University Food Technology and Processing Engineering

Department for analysis. Milk chemical composition was determined following standard methods of Marth (1978). Fat content of the milk was estimated using the Gerber analytical method (O’Connor, 1995). This is based on the principle that fat in milk exists in the form of an emulsion which is stabilised by phospholipids and proteins. The theory of the Gerber method is based on the fact that the fat globules are de-emulsified by the addition of concentrated sulphuric acid (H2SO4). The free fat, with a lower density than the surrounding medium, may be separated rapidly by centrifugal force. Ten ml of sulphuric acid was dispensed into a butyrometer. Then, 11 ml of milk and one ml of amyl alcohol were added into a butyrometer containing the sulphuric acid. The butyrometer was then stoppered and the sample was shaken and inverted several times until all the milk was digested by the acid. Then the butyrometer was placed in a water bath at 65ºC for five minutes. The sample was centrifuged

for five minutes at 1100 rpm. Finally, the sample was returned to the water bath and kept for 5 minutes at 65ºC and fat percentage was read from the butyrometer scale (O’Connor, 1995). Those samples having higher or lower percentages beyond the normal fat ranges were rejected. Finally, average of duplicate samples was computed The formaldehyde titration method was used to determine the total protein content of milk (O’Connor, 1994). This also works in the principle that when formaldehyde is added to 28 milk the free amino groups of the protein react with the carbonyl groups of formaldehyde causing the milk to become acidic. The acidity developed is related to the amount of protein present which may be measured by titrating with sodium hydroxide (NaOH) using phenolphthalein as indicator. Ten ml of milk was added into a beaker Then 04 ml of 04 percent potassium oxalate and 0.5 ml of 05 percent phenolphthalein indicator were added into the milk. It was allowed to stand for two

minutes and then the mixture was titrated with N/9 sodium hydroxide solution until pink colour was obtained. At this stage, two ml of neutral 40% formalin (the formalin solution was made neutral by adding a few drops of phenolphthalein and then adding sodium hydroxide drop by drop until a faint pink colour was obtained) was added to discharge the pink colour. The titration was continued until a pink colour of equal intensity was again obtained. Finally, the number of ml of the N/9 NaOH used after the addition of formalin multiplied by 1.74 gives the percentage protein in the milk (O’Connor, 1995). To determine the total solids content, five grams of milk sample was placed in a preweighed and dried duplicate crucibles. The samples were kept at 102ºC in a hot air oven for 3 hours. The dried samples were taken out from the oven and placed in desiccators to cool and finally weighed (Richardson, 1985). ⎛ Weight of dried sample ⎞ ⎟⎟ × 100 Total solids = ⎜⎜ Sample weight ⎝

⎠ The content was determined by subtracting the percent fat from total solids (O’ Mahony, 1988). The total ash content was determined by igniting the dried milk samples in a muffle furnace in which the temperature was slowly raised to 550ºC. The sample was ignited until carbon (black colour) disappears and a light grey or white ash remains (Richardson, 1985). ⎛ Weight of residue ⎞ ⎟⎟ × 100 Total ash = ⎜⎜ Weight of sample ⎝ ⎠ 29 3.35 Partial budget analysis The economic analysis was based on the calculation of the total cost of supplemented feeds (urea treated wheat straw, noug seed cake, and concentrate) and considering milk sales price and labour cost incurred during the entire experimentation process. The price of milk at Wangedam kebele was fixed to calculate the income obtained per milk yield per day. The costs of the ensiling facilities had also been included in the analysis Partial budget analysis were employed to compute total cost of production

/cow/day, mean kg of milk/treatment/day, cost of production/kg of milk, gross income from sale of milk/treatment/day, net profit/cow/day, and net profit/treatment/day. 3.36 Statistical analysis Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) Version 16 was used to analyze the milk production and marketing systems data. Data from milk yield and composition, live weight change, voluntary dry matter intake (DMI) and IVOMD data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) procedure for RCBD (SAS, 1999). Means were separated using Duncan’s Multiple Range test. The initial milk yield was used as covariate to adjust milk yields during experimental period. The statistical model used was: Yij=µ+ai+bj+eij Where, Y ij= the dependent variable (milk yield, composition and weight gain) µ= the overall mean aj= the effect of the ith diet bj= the effect of the jth block eij = random variation 30 4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 4.1 Milk Production Systems of Bure district From this study,

broadly two major conventional milk cattle production systems namely; the mixed crop–livestock production system in the rural (suburb) areas and the urban (landless) milk cattle production system, which is dominant in Bure town were identified. Specifically, three milk production systems were identified. These include: rural smallholder, peri-urban and urban milk production system This result agrees with the finding of Belete (2006) in Fogera district, Ethiopia. 4.11 Rural small-holder milk production system The rural smallholder milk production system in Bure district contributes 98% of the total milk production in the district which is in agreement with the findings of Mohamed et al., (2004). According to the survey, in this system; cows are not specialized for milk production. However, they are reared for the sake of breeding to have drought oxen Feeds of animals are mainly from communal grazing, crop-residues and crop aftermaths. There is little or no practice (tradition) of

developing improved forages in the studied areas. The only cattle breeds in this system are indigenous. According to this survey, there was no tradition of keeping crossbred cattle. 4.12 Peri-urban milk production system This system was mainly predominant in areas of small towns of Bure district namely Alefa, Kuch, Fetam-Sentom, Zalma and Bekotabo. It contributes only 15% of the total milk production in the district. In this system, milk producers had little or no market orientation depending on the type of producer. The feeds purchased were hay and fermentation by-products of local liquor (Katikala) and local beer. Milk producers under this system are inclined to use improved dairy production techniques such as improved forage varieties and better health supervision of their livestock in cases of disease 31 incidence. Similar to rural milk production system, indigenous cattle breeds are the only cattle breeds kept in this system. 4.13 Urban milk production system The urban

milk production system was identified only in Bure town, the district capital. This system contributes only 0.5% of the milk produced in the district The urban milk production system in this area was found to be similar to what Sintayehu et al. (2008) characterized in Shashemane and Dilla areas of Southern Ethiopia in its market orientation and by the types of inputs used, particularly feeds. The feeds are purchased concentrates (wheat bran and noug seed cake) and roughages of conventional and non-conventional type. Most milk producers found in the town are smallholders with relatively (compared to rural parts) higher composition of Holstein x Friesian crosses of different blood levels. The crossbred cattle comprises of only 7% of the cattle holding in the district. 4.2 Socio-economic Characteristics of Households 4.21 Household characteristics Almost all of the total sampled milk households (97.8%) were Orthodox Christians, while the rest 2% of the respondents were protestants. The

marital status of the sample respondents were married (90.1%), widow and widower (44%), divorced (39%), and single (1.7%) The average age of the respondents were 4508 years, whereas, the average duration of living of the respondent in the study area is 39.3 years with a minimum and maximum duration of 1/2 and 90 years, respectively. The average household size of target respondents was 6.22 persons ( Table 6) The average house hold size observed in this study was smaller than reported by Asaminew (2007) who found an overall mean size of 7.71 persons per family in Mecha and Bahir Dar Zuria districts and Solomon (2004) who found that the overall mean household size in Bale highlands to be 8.73 persons per household In this regard, the smallest family size reported in this study has a positive implication on the average land holding size of the respondents. Similarly, this result was also less than the reports (75) of Berhanu et al, 32 (2007) in Bure district that might be attributed

to the difference in the response of the respondents in telling the actual family size. In contrast, this result was also nearest to what Kedija (2008) has found, i.e, an overall mean family size of 662 in Meiso district in Eastern Ethiopia. However, the result of this study is greater than what was observed by Tesfaye (2007) with over all mean family size of 5.7 persons in Metema district in Northwest Ethiopia. With regard to participation in the local community, 56.1% of respondents are simple members of the community followed by political (16.7%) leaders and elders (20%) Table 6. Age structure of respondent households in Bure district Household age structure (years of age) (N = 181) Mean Maximum SD <7 1.02 4.00 1.02 7-15 1.76 8.00 1.42 16-30 1.89 11.00 1.71 31-60 1.26 2.00 0.79 >60 0.15 2.00 0.45 Overall 6.22 2.36 SD=Standard deviation Education is an important entry point for empowerment of rural communities and an instrument to sustain

development. In this context, educational level of the farming households may have significant importance in identifying and determining the type of development and extension service approaches. The role of education is obvious in affecting household income, adopting technologies, demography, health, and as a whole the socio-economic status of the family as well (Kerealem, 2005). In this finding, family member at elementary school level of education exceeds the proportion of those at higher educational level (Table 7). This shows the growing of educational coverage which provides better opportunity to implement improved agricultural practices and wise use of scarce agricultural resources in the study area. The percentage of illiterate family members (31.5%) reported in this study were less than the reported figure by Fisseha 33 (2009) and Birhanu et al. (2007) which were 393% and 50% , respectively for the same district. Table 7 Educational status of sample respondents in Bure

district Educational status Number of respondents Percent Illiterate 57 31.5 Read and write 69 38.1 Elementary school 36 19.9 High school 9 5.0 Diploma and above 10 5.5 Total 181 100.0 4.22 Land holding and land use pattern The average land holding size of the respondents was 1.33 ha (Table 8) which is much less than the national average land holding size of 2.5 ha This has negative implications in on household income and livestock production. This result also concurs with the result reported by Fiseha (2009) for the same study. The average pasture land size of the respondents was 0.07 hectare There was no significant (P > 0.05) difference among different rural kebeles in pastureland holdings (Appendix 1 Table 3). Wundigi kebele had larger pastureland holding size (01875 ± 052 ha) of per household than other sampled rural kebeles. This study also revealed that the average land allocated for improved forage production was negligible (0.01 hectare) which

notifies further works in creating awareness in forage and pasture development in the district (Table 8). 34 Table 8. Land holding of respondent households in the study area Variables Land holding (ha) No. of respondents Maximum Mean Standard deviation Crop land 181 9.00 1.19 1.18 Private pasture land 180 2.88 0.07 0.24 Improved forage land 180 0.5 0.01 0.05 Artificial plantations 180 1.12 0.06 0.14 Total land holding 180 9.00 1.33 1.25 4.23 Livestock holding The livestock species kept in the area include cattle, sheep, goats and donkey. Cattle are the dominant livestock type in the study area (Table 9). The average numbers of local and crossbred cows were 2.6 and 02 per household, respectively It was also revealed that 93% of the total cattle population was local zebu cows which is different from what was reported (99.5%) by Fiseha (2009) in the same district The mean holding of local oxen (1.88) and local cows (26) in this finding was higher than

the findings of Birhanu et al (2007) in the district which was 1.7 cows per household But, the result of this study about average number of cows/household is smaller than what Asaminew (2007) reported for Bahir Dar Zuria (10.32 cows) and Mecha (937) per household The average number of local and crossbred bulls in the study area is 0.61 per household; whereas, the average numbers of calves both local and crossbred blood types were 1.71 and 009 per household, respectively. Majority of the respondents were primarily involved in milk production (68.1%) followed by Shoat production (31.9%) According to the respondents, compared to other livestock enterprises, most of the income is generated from milk production activity (86.6%) followed by sheep and goat production (11.6%), and poultry production (23%) The average experience in milk production of sample respondents in the study areas was 18.16 years with a maximum of 60 years. 35 Table 9. Herd structure and composition per household in

Bure district Livestock Local breed Crossbreds type N Mean SD N Mean SD Cows 181 2.57 1.98 174 0.20 1.19 Heifers 180 1.25 1.38 152 0.09 0.41 Bulls 180 0.61 0.93 180 0.61 0.93 Oxen 181 1.88 1.56 181 0.01 0.15 Calves 179 1.71 1.61 174 0.09 0.47 Sheep 181 2.49 4.03 Goats 180 0.43 1.73 Donkeys 181 0.49 0.84 Mules 181 0.04 0.21 Horses 181 0.02 0.154 Chicken 181 3.84 10.61 Honeybee 181 0.97 2.44 SD= Standard Deviation; N= Number of respondents According to the findings of this study, educational status of a milk household has a positive correlation with number of owned crossbred cows with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.26 (significant at 1%) This finding implies the notion that education is the key to facilitate the degree of adoption of improved livestock production technologies. 4.24 Involvement of sample respondents in non-farm activities The milk producers of Bure not only involved solely in livestock and

crop production, they were also involved in non farm activities to supplement their income. About 343% of the respondents participated in non-farm activity such as co-worker (4.8%), veteran (113%), carpenter (12.9%), broker (16%), trade (386%), and guard (65%) According to the survey, men (55.7%) were predominantly involved in non-farm activities followed by women (21.3%), and son (49%) The average amount of money earned from non-farm activities was 16083 ETB with a minimum and maximum of 160 and 30000 ETB per annum respectively. The higher figure in the amount of money earned reported in this 36 study might be due to the income gained by traders who relatively obtain higher income per annum. 4.25 Availability of credits Access to credit for financing investment and farm operations is crucial to the commercialization of smallholder agriculture. However, the survey result highlighted that producers’ knowledge related to issues of milk production credit was found to be limited

and use of credit for milk production is low in the surveyed kebeles. In this respect, only 32.8% of the respondents have access to credit The main credit sources of the sample respondents were cooperatives (58%), Amhara Credit and Saving Institution (34%), and IPMS (8%). The reasons given by those respondents for not having access to credit were shown in Table 10 that included lack of access (41.5%), high interest rate (207%), selfsufficiency (293%), lack of collateral (24%), and lengthy process of the credit system (6.1%) Table 10. Percent distribution of reasons of sample respondents for not having access to credit services in Bure district Problems N Percent Lack of access 34 41.5 High interest rate 17 20.7 Self sufficient 24 29.3 Lack of collateral 2 2.4 Lengthy process 5 6.1 Total 82 100.0 N=number of respondents 4.26 Milk production extension service With regard to milk production extension service, the result of this study revealed that the contact of

development agents with milk producers was not frequent and regular. In this regard only 45.5% of the respondents had access to extension service Besides, it was noted that only 15% of the respondents got trainings related to milk production. Moreover, 37 the services rendered were very limited, untimely, and irregular. The majority of milk respondents get various information types concerning milk production; these include how to manage milk cows properly, improvement of milk breeds, and use of artificial insemination, improved feeding, frequent health care, market opportunity, conservation and treatment of agricultural crop residues. The sample milk producers do not only access information about milk production (Table 11) from extension agents (54.2%) but also from other sources such as previous family experience (13.1%), colleagues (114%), reading text (12%), cooperatives (05%), radio (0.6%), NGOs (03%), while the rest (178%) use their own experience Among the total interviewed

respondents, 80% of them have radio and had the chance to listen about on dairy production. This survey showed that informal knowledge flow plays vital role for sharing of experiences among milk producers that in turn build up indigenous knowledge. The majority of milk activity is geared by self-owned form of indigenous knowledge. This again indicated the necessity of taking indigenous knowledge into consideration in each and every modern milk development intervention. Table 11. Major sources of information for milk production in Bure district Sources Number of respondents Percent OARD/DA and IPMS 101 56.6 Their own experience 50 17.8 Ancestor experience 4 13.1 Colleagues 3 11.4 Cooperative 1 0.5 Radio 1 0.6 OARD=Office of Agriculture and ural Development; IPMS= Improving Productivity and Market Success of Ethiopian Farmers Project. 38 4.3 Husbandry Practices 4.31 Purpose of keeping cattle As an integral part of the mixed farming system, livestock production

plays a substantial role in the household food security in ANRS. It meets urgent financial need, dietary requirements, draft power, transport, loan repayment, dowry and gift, fuel, fertilizer, as a buffer in the case of crop failure, and also for social and cultural functions. Milk producers of Bure district keep their livestock for draught power, consumption /meat and milk/, income generation, breeding and transportation in order of their importance (Table 12). These functions of livestock were also reported by Asaminew (2007) in Mecha and Bahir Dar Zuria districts of Western Gojam and Keralem (2005) in Enebise esar Midir and Amaro special district of Ethiopia. A study by Adebabay et al (2008) in ANRS region also reported the multipurpose role of cattle. Table 12. Purpose of keeping livestock in Bure district Purpose Reported purpose of keeping livestock (%) Cows Oxen Heifers Sheep Goats Donkey Mule Horse - 96.3 - - - - - - Consumption (meat/milk) 90.8 8.2 21.0

80.0 76.5 - - - Income 44.3 21.8 26.4 82.4 93.8 30.4 - - Transport - - - - - 100 100 100 Dowry and gift 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - Reproduction 98.3 13.4 100 91.8 100 70.2 - 0 Draught power 4.32 Labour use and cattle husbandry In Bure district, hired labour is mainly responsible for herding and feeding of milk cattle (Table 11). This is inconsistent with the practice in Mecha and Bahir Dar Zuria district (Asaminew, 2007). Milking is done mainly by men (526%), while processing and sale of milk products and barn cleaning are mainly the jobs of women followed by female 39 children. This finding is in contrast to the findings of Kedija (2008) who found in Meiso district that milking is primarily undertaken by women. Sale of live animals and breeding decisions are undertaken mostly by men (95.4%) This result showed that women have no equal participation in the decision of household affairs i.e decisions are made solely by men. Therefore, this result

indicated, the necessity of gender education in the district so that women can be empowered in every social, economic, cultural and political context. Majority of the respondents answered that men have greater contribution in milk farming (61.7%) followed by female (128%) and male and female equally (256%) Table 13. Share of responsibilities in cattle husbandry among family members in Bure district Percent of responsible family members Activity Men Women Male Children Female children Hired labor Herding 10.0 1.0 35.0 3.7 50.3 Feeding 17.6 15.8 34.5 7.0 46.4 Caring of calves 21.4 22.5 27.9 11.2 28.6 Milking 52.6 36.9 8.1 4.1 8.5 Processing 0.6 88.8 2.6 14.8 2.2 Barn cleaning 10.5 39.7 20.9 27.6 16.8 Sale of milk products 6.5 71.9 7.1 10.6 6.1 Sale of livestock 93.6 10.9 1.2 1.2 1.0 Breeding decision 95.4 12.5 2.3 1.2 1 4.33 Feeds and feeding Livestock feeds are the major inputs in any milk production activity (Sintayehu et

al., 2008). The types of feeding systems noted from this study were communal grazing and stall feeding. This study also indicated that the major sources of feed for cattle in the study area are natural pasture, hay, crop-residues, crop-aftermaths and non-conventional feedstuffs such as ‘attella’/brewery by-product from locally produced beer/ and ‘birint’/a by-product from locally produced catikala/. Concentrates are rarely used with the 40 exception of those milk producers who keep crossbred cows. Generally, residues from cereals such as teff straw, wheat straw, barley straw and maize stover form the basal diets of the animals. This finding is in line with the report of Asaminew (2007) and Seyoum et al. (2007) who indicated that the major basal feed resources for cattle in Bahir Dar and Mecha districts and the highlands of Ethiopia, respectively, are natural pasture, crop residue and stubble grazing. Depending on the type of milk production systems feed troughs and

watering utensils made up of wood, plastic and concrete are used in the study area. According to 553% of the respondents, there is a presence of feed shortage mainly during January to June. There is even feed shortage between July and September (35%). Some 10% reported year round feed shortage. During times of feed shortage, 98% of the respondents exercise conservation of crop residues, hay curing and supplementation with agro-industrial byproducts or conventional feeds (2%). The main feed related constraints prevailing in the area are low productivity and shortage of grazing land and overstocking (16.5%), water logging (29%) and burning of grazing lands (1.2%) The main problems related to hay availability are shortage of land (710%), high cost (5.3%) and non-availability (41%) Burning of grazing lands is a common phenomenon in the drier areas of Bekotabo kebele. In this kebele, milk producers do not have the tradition of hay curing. Therefore, practices of hay making should be adopted

in the area. The main problems related to improved forage availability are lack of awareness (31.4%), lack of seed (35.5%), and lack of land (494%), poor adaptability (12%) Lack of awareness (38.2%), less accessibility (206%), costly (265%), adulteration (18%) are main problems related to concentrate availability in the study area. The main problems of crop residue availability are shortage of production (53.5%) and unaffordable cost (53%) The reported feed related constraints in this study are consistent with the reports of Belete (2006) in Fogera district and Asaminew (2007) in Mecha and Bahir Dar Zuria districts. The dominant crop residues in the study area are finger millet straw (30.7%), maize stovers (30.1%), teff straw (244%), and wheat straw (11%) The majority of the respondents (98.3%) practice conserving feed for times of feed shortage Only 128% of the respondents exercise urea treatment. Milk producers also reported that teff straw 41 (23.1%), barley straw (231%),

wheat straw (231%) and millet straw (77 %) are the straw types farmers ammoniate with urea because of their availability in the area. To overcome the seasonal shortage of feed, the respondents practice various coping mechanisms like conservation of hay and crop residues and supplementation with nonconventional feed sources, such as ‘attela’ and ‘birint’ especially in landless milk production in small towns. Furthermore, concentrate and improved forage supplementation is practiced by few respondents especially those who own crossbred cows in Bure town. The average grazing hours of local and crossbred cows were 11.26 h and 845 h, respectively, whereas, the average grazing hours of local and crossbred calves were 10.16 h and 7.94 h, respectively The survey result also showed that the average watering frequency of local and crossbred cows were 2.48 and 244 times per day, respectively From this result, it was noted that the watering frequency of both local and crossbred cows was not

significantly different (P<0.05) This in turn implies that even improved breeds are managed in a similar management conditions as that of local breeds. The mean reported watering frequencies of local and crossbred calves were 2.44 and 25 times per day, respectively According to this study, on average, cattle trek 0.99 km for search of water per day (Figure 14) Table 14. Watering frequency of local and cross bred cows and calves in Bure district Type of cattle Watering frequency N Minimum Maximum Mean SD Local cows 174 1.00 5.00 2.48 0.69 Local calves 170 1.00 5.00 2.44 0.73 Cross bred cows 9 1.00 5.00 2.44 1.33 Cross bred calves 8 1.00 5.00 2.50 1.41 N=number of respondents; SD=Standard deviation 42 4.34 Cattle housing practices in Bure district In Bure district, milk producers either keep their cattle on communal grazing lands/homestead or in the house (Figure 9). Tethering of cattle in the homestead and nearby farmlands is practiced to take

advantage of fertilization of their back yards through rotational manuring. The dung is used to fertilize the communal pasture The oxen are housed since they are used mainly for traction purposes in the dry and wet seasons. Most farmers house their cattle in the dry as well as wet seasons, although some of them did not house cattle in both seasons. This practice is in agreement with the results of Belete (2006) in Fogera district. The purposes of housing in the study areas are to protect cattle from theft and from extreme weather conditions. The majority of milk producers reported that they keep their local cattle in isolated pen (57.3%) followed by open paddock (253%), together with family (12.7%), and ward/ partition of the main building/ (47%) The reported percentage of respondents who house their cattle in a separate pen is higher than what Asaminew (2007) found in Bahir Dar Zuria and Mecha Districts. In contrast, the reported proportions of milk households who keep their cattle in

family house are less. With regard to housing of crossbred cattle, 100% of the milk producers keep their cattle in separate pens (Table 15). Table 15. Cattle housing and facilities in the barn in Bure district Barn type Number of cases Percent Separate pen 98 57.3 Open paddock at grazing lands/ back yard grounds 53 25.3 Main building with the owner 12 12.7 Ward 8 4.7 Total 171 100.0 43 4.35 Calf rearing Calf rearing practice is one of the most important husbandry practices, which sustain milk herd through supplying replacement stock. However, although calf rearing is the most delicate activity in milking, it is a practice often neglected in Ethiopia (SDDP, 1999). Similar report by Gebre Egziabher et al. (2000) also emphasized that calf suckling resulted in higher milk yield and long lactation length of the dam, higher pre-weaning gain of the calf, and higher weaning weight. Even though, colostrum is regarded as the corner stone of calf rearing, the importance of

colostrum to newborn calves has not been understood for many years by small holder farmers of Ethiopia. About 683% of the respondents provide colostrums immediately after calving. But, the rest of the respondents do not have the habit of providing colostrum immediately after calving mainly due to the belief that colostrums causes drying of faeces (mecoin), tongue disease, diarrhoea, and stomach-ache in newly born calves. Therefore, awareness should be created on the importance of colostrum for the newly born calves. This finding is in line with a study that showed 40-70% of two-three day old calves in dairy farms do not receive ideal levels of protection through colostrums feeding (Tadesse et al., 2005) As an indigenous practice, milk producers provide squeezed prunus persica leaves and enkula hareg (Solanecio angelatus) for ‘colostrum discomfort’. Milk producers have also the habit of providing plant species known in Amharic as litt, wheat, rye, barley and millet flour, and

‘atella’ and ‘birint’ as a supplement in various recipes. Two modes of milk feeding were noticed in Bure. These were restricted partial suckling and bucket feeding Bucket feeding is practiced only in those milk households who own crossbred cows; whereas partial suckling is mainly practiced in those households who own local zebu cows. In the study area, only 8.9% of the respondents exercise weaning, of which, 643% of the respondents exercise partial weaning and the rest employ abrupt weaning. The methods of pre-weaning milk feeding are partial suckling (96.6%) and bucket feeding (34%) The percent of milk producers that exercise bucket feeding are less than what is reported in 44 Bahir Dar Zuria and greater than in Mecha district (Asaminew, 2007). The main reported reason for weaning calves was to prepare the cow for mating. The systems of weaning calves as reported by milk producers were isolation of calves from cows (78.6%) and smearing of teats with manure (21.4%) Similar

results were also found in the reports of Kedija (2008). 4.4 Reproductive and Productive Performance of Cows 4.51 Age at first service The average ages at first service (AFS) of local and crossbred heifers were, 42.48 months and 27.24 months, respectively The result reported for local Zebu heifers (4248 months) in this study is in the range of what Gidey (2001) reported for fogera heifers (44+8 months) at Andassa Livestock Research Centre, while the reported result for crossbred heifers is found to be less (35.7+04) The average age at first effective service for local and crossbred bulls was 50.4 months and 3192 months, respectively 4.52 Age at first calving The reported average age at first calving (AFC) of local and crossbred heifers were, 53.52 months and 34.68 months, respectively The result of this study for local zebus is almost similar with what was reported by Mukassa-Mugerwa et al (1989) for local zebus (53.0 months) but is less than the AFC reported by Gidey (2001) for

fogera cows (54.6 months) The result depicted for crossbred cows (35 months) was higher than what was reported by Albero (1983) for Fresian x Zebu cows (29.1 months) This variation might be due to the difference in the level of management and other inputs as this figure is an on-farm finding in contrast to that of Albero (1983). 4.53 Number of service per conception The reported average number of services per conception (NSC) of local and crossbred cows was 1.59 and 491 respectively According to Mukassa - Mugerwa (1989), cows with 45 values of NSC greater than two (2), are regarded as poor. However, the higher figure NSC in crossbred cows (4.91) might be attributed to the low efficacy of artificial insemination (AI) services for various reported reasons like lack of skilled AI technician, nonsynchronization of heat and insemination and lack of effective frozen semen in the district. 4.54 Calving Interval The result of this study depicted that the calving intervals (CI) of local

and cross cows were 26.04 months and 162 months, respectively The reported CI in this study are almost similar to the estimates of Mukassa-Mugrewa et al. (1989) (25 months) in zebu cattle However, it was much higher than reported by McDowell (1971) for Horro breed (12.2 months); Swensson et al. (1981) for Arsi breed (129 months); Gidey (2001) for Fogera breed (18.6 months) and Goshu (1981) for Barka breed (118 months) 4.55 Lactation length and average milk yield of local and crossbred cows The overall average lactation lengths of local and crossbred cows were 9.8 and 101 months, respectively (Table 16). This result was higher than the average lactation length of local cows (7.29 months) at Meiso district (Kedija, 2008) The lactation length of the indigenous cows observed in this study is higher than the national average (7 months) (CSA, 2005), while the lactation length in crossbred cows observed in this study is slightly shorter than the lactation length of 11.7 months reported for

crossbred cows in the Central Highlands of Ethiopia (Zelalem and Ledin, 2001). The overall mean milk yields per cow per day of local and crossbred cows were 1.82 and 8 litres, respectively. This result for local cows is higher than the average milk yield per cow per day (1.24 litres) of local cows in Meiso district of Oromia Regional State (Kedija, 2008). Similarly, the reported average milk yields for the different stages of lactation in this study are higher than what was reported by Asaminew (2007) in Mecha and Bahir Dar Zuria Districts, which was 2.0, 12 and 06 litres for the first, second and third lactations, respectively with an overall average milk yield of 1.2 litres for local cows and 73, 55 and 3.5 litres for the first, second and third lactations, respectively with an overall average of 5.2 litres for crossbred cows In general, the higher average daily milk yield per cow and 46 the variation in lactation length in the present study might be attributed to the difference

in agro-ecology, nature of research (on-farm and on-station) and breed of animals characterized. Even though, it is expected that theoretically milk yield is greater in early lactation, this study showed an increasing trend in the mid lactation. This might be due to the practice incomplete milking (leave higher proportion to cows during stage of early lactation that milk producers practice). In contrast, as it is expected a decreasing trend was reported for crossbred cows as long as milk producers practice complete milking practice. Table 16. Reported daily milk yield of cows in Bure district Breed Stage of lactation N Minimum Maximum Mean+ SE SD (litres/day) Local Cross early 170 0.50 6.00 2.32+089 1.16 mid 171 0.50 8.00 2.18+096 1.26 late 171 0.45 4.00 0.96+053 0.69 early 13 0.50 24.00 10.96+173 6.23 mid 13 2.00 16.00 9.12+119 4.29 late 12 2.00 8.00 5.04+074 2.56 N= Number of respondents; SD=Standard deviation 4.55 Breed and breeding

practices From this survey, highland zebu and local x Holstein Friesian crossbred types were recognized. According to the respondents, cattle with blood level of about 50%, 75% and greater than 87.5% are predominant in Bure town (Table 17) Two types of breeding practices viz: natural mating and artificial insemination are common in the study area. Bulls can be used for two main types of natural mating, either free mating in the range or controlled mating. In the former system, however, heat detection is carried out by the bull and cows in heat are usually mated several times during each heat period which increases the number of services per conception (NSC). In controlled mating systems, heat detection and timing of service is carried out by the farmer and each cow is mated once or twice 47 during each heat period. During the breeding season some farmers mate their cows and heifers by the superior bulls owned by themselves or their neighbours. Most of the farmers bred their cows

by any bull available in the herd when their cows come to heat. Table 17. Reported number of crossbred cattle by sample respondents Cattle type Exotic blood level (%) 50 62.5 75 >87.5 Cows 7 1 20 10 Heifer 7 0 3 4 Bulls 3 0 1 5 Calves 6 0 0 10 Total 23 1 24 29 The majority of the respondents (63.1%) prefer natural bull service (natural mating) to artificial insemination for their own reasons that artificial insemination has high chance of resulting in the birth of male calves, and the belief that natural (bull) service has high degree of conception. Due to this fact, 927% of the respondents use local bulls for mating followed by AI (1.75%) and both AI and bull service (56%) This finding confirms the claim that AI is not commonly used in many tropical milk production systems: natural (bull) service using a bull is practiced (Mattewman, 1993 as cited in Belete (2006)). Therefore, further works in areas of AI deserves more attention to reduce the reported

low conception in AI by synchronizing the peak heat period and the time of insemination Only 7.8% of the respondents have crossbred animals The sources of crossbred milk animals were government (12.5%), NGO (62%), market (688%), and AI (125%) About 63.7% of the respondents indicated their willingness to keep crossbred animals in the future. In this regard, the average duration of keeping crossbred cattle was 75 years in the study area. According to 54.2% of the respondents, cows come into heat mostly in the dry season particularly during September to January when adequate feed resources are available. About 9.5% of the respondents answered that their cows come into heat during the rainy season and 36.3% responded both rainy and dry season 48 Only 23.9% of the respondents have breeding bull Mostly breeding bulls are used for own and neighbour herd service freely (76.7%) Only 39% of the respondents exercise seasonal mating for various reasons like feed shortage (57.1%) and to ensure

year round supply of milk (14.3%) This showed that controlled and planned mating is not the most common practice in the study area. Therefore, awareness should be created in the areas of planned and controlled mating to synchronize delivery of calves to season of better feed availability. About 876% of the respondents answered that the peak mating season is during December to January. According to milk producers, the main reported sources of AI were government (93.8%), followed by NGO (6.2%) The main problems of AI (Table 18) in the area are lack of access (77.3%), shortage of liquid nitrogen and semen (109%), distance to AI station (4.3%), non-effectiveness of AI (65%) and unwillingness of AI technicians (1%) Table 18. Major constraints for access to artificial insemination in Bure district Problem of AI N Percent Lack of access 146 77.3 Shortage of liquid nitrogen and semen 15 10.9 Non-effectiveness of the service 8 6.5 Distance to AI station 6 4.3 Unwillingness of AI

technicians 6 1.0 4.5 Cattle Diseases The major reported cattle diseases prevailing in the study area were respiratory diseases (pneumonia), pasteurolosis, lumpy skin disease, anthrax, malignant fever, tuberculosis, blackleg, wooden tongue, trypanosomiasis and septicaemia. According to animal health technician the occurrence of these diseases is serious in Bekotabo and Fetam-Sentom. However, there is no animal health centre in the kebeles. 49 Despite the prevalence of various diseases, according to majority of (73.2%) the respondents, there is problem of animal health services. The main reported animal health problems were lack of veterinary drugs, less frequent animal health service, remoteness of animal health centres, lack of skilled animal health technicians, lack of laboratory services, and lack of timely vaccination of their animals. On average farmers travel about 216 km and a maximum of 20 km to get to an animal health centre. According to the respondents, the average

number of diseased animals per household in 2008 G.C was 314 with a maximum and minimum of 25 and 0 animals. The average mortality of livestock in 2008 G.C was 107+244 with a maximum of 25 animals per household A milk producer on average spends about 8.85 ETB per head for control of ecto-parasites such as ticks. The average cost per head for controlling endo-parasites is about 268 ETB per head. According to the survey result, milk producers of Bure district have various indigenous knowledge of controlling ecto-parasites (Table 19). In this regard, however, the efficacy of these indigenous practices deserves further investigation. Table 19. Reported indigenous ecto-parasite controlling mechanisms in Bure district Ecto-parasites Controlling methods Ticks Punching by spine: painting with fresh manure, applying white gas to the skin and fermented mud; washing with lupin leaves; spraying with feto flour and honey mix; fumigating with human hair. Skin disease Painting with Calpurnia

aurea leaves About 86.2% of the respondents have access to veterinary services The major reported sources of veterinary services were government (61.4%), private (42%), NGOs (54%) and both government and NGOs (12.7%) The major calving difficulties (382%) that predominate in the study area were placental retention (44%), abortion (30.3%), still birth (7.8%), and large sized calf (33%), late delivery (58%) and dystocia (14%) 50 4.6 Handling Practices of Milk and Milk Utensils 4.61 Milking and milk handling practices This study indicated that 97.2% of the respondents exercise suckling before milking, while 2.8% of them milk without suckling Only 112% of the respondents practice complete milking. Even though local cows refuse milking in the absence of their calves, 288% of the respondents exercise milking when calves die by using salt and artificial dolls (by stuffing the skin of the calf with a straw and spraying salt over it). The majority of the respondents clean their milk

utensils once per day (73.2%) followed by twice (251%) and three times (25.1%) per day To extend the shelf life (Table 20) of milk and milk products, milk producers of Bure district exercise smoking (for milk and yoghurt), spicing (for cheese and ghee), and washing (for butter). Kega (Rosa abissinica), gebre embuay (Solanium indicum), ayit hareg (Solanecio angelatus), cheba (Acacia nilotica), daba keded, woira (Olea africana), digita (Calpurnia aurea), teji, girar (Acacia spp.), tinjut, wetera, prunus persica, tid (Juniperus procera), girawa (Vernonia spp), agam (Carissa edulis), korekonda, defek, hole, enkuay (Ximenia americana), and huda are used for smoking of milk and milk product containers. Table 20. Reported shelf life of milk products in Bure district Milk product N Minimum Maximum Mean SD (Days) Milk 156 0.00 3.00 1.06 0.54 Ergo 160 2.00 21.00 6.73 3.45 Butter 142 1.00 365.00 21.76 34.41 Cheese 144 1.00 60.00 2.38 4.96 Ghee 143 1.00 730.00

318.67 176.06 N= Number of respondents; SD= Standard deviation 51 Even though washing hands and milking vessels is used as hygienic practices, washing of udder before and after milking is exercised only by few of the respondents (7.9%) About 95.4% of the respondents use bare hands to dry the udder of cows, while 23% of them use individual towel and 2.3% of the respondents use one towel for a group cows About 41% of the respondents use milk for medicinal value in various recipes apart from its role for nutritional values. They use fresh whole milk to neutralize toxins and butter for hair ointment. This result agrees with the report of Asaminew (2007) in Mecha and Bahir Dar Zuria districts and Woldemichael (2008) in Shashamene, Hawassa and Dale districts. Milk producers also reported that Metata Ayib is used to cure malaria and stomach upset (Table 21). The reported medicinal value of Metata Ayib might be due to the spices (ex white garlic) added as a preservative which requires

further investigation. Table 21. Medicinal value of milk products in Bure district Disease Milk and milk product Malaria Metata ayib + whey +spices Bloat Butter Ascaries Local drug+ whole milk Mich Ghee + milk (boiled) Stomach upset Butter + yoghurt Poison Yoghurt 4.62 Facilities used for storage and processing of milk products Three types of containers are used for storage and processing of milk products depending on the scale and type of milk enterprise. These include gourd, clay pot, and plastic and steel buckets. Gourd is the major container used for milking and storing of milk products in the rural areas of Bure district, especially by smallholder farmers. Girera, Kabo and Gurna are the types of gourds used for milking, storage and churning of milk, respectively. In small towns of Bure district and Bure town, plastic buckets are used for milking and as milk storage equipments, whereas, clay pot, steel manual churner and gourd, are used for 52 churning. Bure

Damot Milk Cooperative has better milk collection and churning facilities These include: stainless steel buckets, plastic buckets, manual cream separators and churners. 4.7 Consumption and utilization of milk Products Whole milk, sour milk, butter, buttermilk, traditional cottage cheese, whey, Metata Ayib and Zure were among the common milk products produced and consumed in the study area. Milk is consumed after boiling (632%), souring (143%) and raw (225%) Butter is used for various purposes like cooking (61%), cosmetic purposes, especially by the female members of the household (38.2%), and sale (18%) Buttermilk is used for both animal and human consumption (70%) and production of cottage cheese (30%). All the milk produced and consumed is obtained from cows (from both local and crossbred cows) and there was no report of milk utilization from sheep and goats in the study area due to cultural taboo. This finding is in line with the finding of Asaminew (2007) at Mecha and Bahir Dar

zuria district. Among family members, children (babies of less than one year of age) have the privilege to drink whole milk (Table 22). Table 22. Percent of milk product users of Bure district by rank Milk product % users of milk products by rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Milk 27.5 10.5 15.1 18.7 16 14.5 0.0 0.0 Ergo 12.9 30.4 13.2 16.4 14.9 3.6 3.0 0.0 Butter milk 14.6 9.9 13.8 9.0 12.8 14.5 3.0 0.0 Ayib 18.5 26.9 24.5 11.2 16.0 1.8 3.0 0.0 Ghee 19.1 13.5 14.5 25.4 12.8 7.3 3.0 0.0 Metata Ayib 6.2 7.6 14.5 14.9 18.1 25.5 9.1 0.0 Zure 0.6 0.0 1.3 1.5 3.2 3.6 6.1 50 Whey 0.6 1.2 3.1 3.0 6.4 29.1 72.1 50 53 4.8 Marketing of Milk and Butter at Bure district Milk producers of Bure not only consume milk products, but also sell the surplus milk and butter to consumers, retailers and cooperatives. The income gained from the sale of milk products is used to purchase farm inputs like milk cows, feed, fertilizer and

improved crop varieties (17.6%) as well as food and non food items like education materials for their children (82.4%), 4.81 Marketing systems The survey results depicted that milk and butter in the study area were found to be marketed mainly through informal marketing systems. Milk price in the areas was found to vary considerably depending upon fasting and non-fasting period. 4.82 Milk marketing channels and chains Marketable milk commodities in the area include whole milk, butter, ergo (fermented whole milk), cheese and buttermilk. From this survey, different butter and milk market participants were identified in marketing functions between producer and the final consumer. Milk producers, milk cooperatives, and consumers were key participants in the milk market. Similarly, milk producers, a cooperative, itinerate traders and consumers were key participants in the butter market. The number of intermediaries in a given marketing channel has a bearing effect on both producer and

consumer milk prices. The shorter the channel, the more likely the lower consumer prices will be and a higher return to the producers. Therefore, in this context it looks that milk market participants of Bure district took the advantage so long as shortest market channels are prevailing compared to what Woldemichael (2008) has found a relatively longer channel with higher involvement of marketing agents. The survey result also identified that there were different types of milk marketing channels. Producer Consumer: This channel accounts for 48.3% of total milk marketed per day in Bure district. This channel is predominant at Alefa and Bure district Producer Cooperative Consumer: This channel (40.6%) was identified to be exceptional to Bure town. 55 Producer trader (hotels, tea kiosks); this channel accounts 6.8% of the total milk marketed in the district. The major butter marketing channels identified during the survey period are: Producer Consumer: This channel is found to

involve the direct sale of butter to consumers in the immediate neighbourhood and local market places. The channel was the shortest in terms of intermediaries and smallest in terms of volume of butter and value. Those consumers who usually purchase butter for cosmetics rather than cooking butter are categorized in this channel. Butter for consumption is mostly purchased in markets where there is better supply of butter in terms of quality and quantity with ample bargaining alternatives. Producer Retailer Consumer: This channel is exercised at Bure and Kuch saturday markets. In this channel retailers buy butter from the market and sell in the same market to make some profit. According to the respondents, the reported modes of payment for milk purchase were cash (13.8%), cash in advance (172%) and contract (69%) About 98% of butter sale employs cash payment followed by cash in advance (1.6%) The reported milk outlets were farm gate (18.8%) and door to door delivery (202%) while the

reported butter outlet were market place (83.4%) and farm gate (166%) 56 Table 23. Reported milk & butter buyers, mode of payment and milk outlet in Bure district Milk buyer type N Percent 140 48.3 Traders (hotels, tea kiosks) 2 6.9 Cooperative 23 44.8 Butter buyer type N Percent Consumers 124 66.4 Retailers (hotels and hawkers ) 51 30.6 Mode of payment N Percent Cash 164 98.4 Cash in advance Milk outlets 12 1.6 Consumers Milk Butter N Percent N Percent Farm gate/homestead 15 68.8 30 16.6 Market place 48 0 120 83.4 Door to door delivery 16 20.2 27 0 N= Number of respondents 4.83 Determinants of price, demand and supply of milk products During the survey period (October), the average price of milk in the area was 4.00 ETB per litre (Table 24). The average price of butter was 3908 ETB per kg with a minimum and maximum price of 31.34 ETB and 4686 ETB per kg, respectively From this study it was noted that various factors affect

the price, demand and supply of milk products in the study area. These included season (dry versus wet), distance to market points, fasting periods, festival and holidays. The results of this study are similar to the findings of Sintayehu et al. (2008) During the wet season due to better availability of feeds there is an increase in milk yield and in turn other milk products per household and per animal compared to the dry season, hence, the better supply to the destination market. 57 Fasting periods are the second indispensable determinants of demand, supply and thus price of milk and butter in Bure district. The price of butter and milk were highly affected by fasting periods of especially Orthodox Christians. For instance, the price of one litre of skimmed milk is 4.00 ETB in non fasting periods Whereas, during fasting periods the price of a litre of skimmed milk is about 3.50 ETB in Bure Damot Cooperative During this period, a high proportion of fresh whole milk was processed

into butter. However, during periods of various festivals and holidays, milk products especially butter is highly demanded and thus commands higher prices in market. This fact is similar to what Sinayehu et al. (2008) has noted in his survey in Shashemane and Dilla areas of Southern Ethiopia. The most inevitable determinant of demand, supply and price of milk products is distance to market points. On average a milk and milk product producer of Bure trek 062 km (Table 24) to sell his/her milk product. Especially, rural milk producers of Bure district have no habit of fresh milk selling due to long distance to marketing points; rather, they process it into butter. Table 24. Price of milk and butter and distance to market points in Bure district Variables N Minimum Maximum Mean SD Price of milk per litre 26 3.50 4.00 4.00 0.83 Price of butter per kg 52 20.00 65.00 39.08 8.82 Distance travelled to sell milk ( Km) 26 0.00 4.00 0.62 0.88 Distance travelled to sell

butter (km) 62 0.00 20.00 6.33 5.11 Transport cost per round trip (ETB) 30 0.00 10.00 8.30 18.12 N= Number of respondents; SD= Standard Deviation 4.9 Constraints of Milk production, Processing and Marketing in Bure district Milk production provides the opportunity for small holder farmers to use land, labor, and feed resources and generate regular income. In this respect, support services in terms of accessing adequate land, organizing input supplies (improved genetic material, feeds, AI, drugs), provision of credit, extension and training services, production and entrepreneurial skills development, sound market opportunity and linkage are the key elements of success 58 for the milk industry (Sintyehu et al., 2008) However, milk producers in the study area suffer from a number of difficulties and challenges that are antagonistic to the success desired in the milk industry. Milk production and marketing in the milk shed was found to be constrained by various factors

related to production, processing and marketing. 4.91 Milk production constraints The problems of milk production (Table 24) in the study area are shortage of feed, disease outbreak, inadequate supply of improved cattle breeds, poor breeding system, shortage of land for feed production, poor feeding system, shortage of grazing land, ecto-parasite problem, lack of cooperatives, especially outside Bure, less accessibility to agro-industrial by-products, lack of close examination of disease outbreaks, and absence of community bull service in the area. Inadequate access to water for both human and livestock use during the dry season was also identified as a priority problem in the area. Livestock had to trek on average 5 km in search of drinking water. Besides, lack of clean water was found to be problem of the study district. Particularly, the infestation of rivers and ponds by leech (alekit) is a very serious problem. Limited and unsafe veterinary and artificial insemination services

and poor milk cattle management system had negative impact on milk production system of the area. Even though access to credit is crucial to the commercialization of smallholder agriculture, the survey result highlighted that milk producers have little or no access to milk credit. Besides, lack of skills in different aspects of milk activities was among the other problems encountered. Problems of seasonal availability of roughage feeds can be minimized through conventional feed conservation practices like hay making, silage making and straw treatment so that sustainable supply of roughage feeds can be ensured through out the year. Similarly, the availability and affordability of concentrate feeds can be improved by formation of collective groups. 59 Table 25. Constraints of milk production Constraints N Percent Shortage of feed 86 47.5 Disease outbreak and parasite infestation 58 32.0 In adequate supply of improved cattle breed 19 10.5 Inadequate access to water 12

6.6 Lack of close examination of disease out breaks 6 3.3 N=number of respondents 4.92 Milk and butter marketing constraints There are a number of highlighted constraints that hamper further development of milk sector in Bure milk shed. Given the current production level, there appears that 195% of the milk producers in the study area have market problems. In this case, the less possibilities of improved milk production technology, under developed milk market and absolute absence of milk processing plants in the area might have contributed to problems currently prevailing in the milk shed. The result also depicted that primarily, seasonal fluctuations in demand of milk products due to long fasting periods was found to be the major bottleneck in both milk production and marketing in Bure where the Orthodox Christianity is predominant (97.8%) Milk producing households also reported that seasonality of demand and supply of milk was one of their vital problems in milk production and

marketing. With regard to marketing of milk products in the studied district, distance to marketing points, lack of training related to milk product marketing and adulteration of milk with water and butter (Table 26) was considered as a problem. This result is similar to the findings of Sintayehu et al. (2008) in Shashemane, Dilla area of Southern Ethiopia In the same work it has been stated that for the seasonality in demand for milk and milk products, processing technologies which could extend the shelf life of milk products may resolve the problem. For potential milk areas, where there is no market access, a milk collection scheme through establishment of milk marketing groups may alleviate the problem. Moreover, market-oriented milk extension trainings that cover a wide range of marketing and socio-economic issues should be provided to extension officers to enable them link 60 these skills and knowledge to efficient production through improving farmers access, understanding and

utilization of market information. Table 26. Milk and butter marketing constraints Constraints N percent Distant to marketing points 123 67.9 Lack of training related to milk product marketing 45 24.9 Adulteration of milk and butter 13 7.2 N=Number of respondents 4.10 Bure Damot Milk Cooperative In commercial agriculture, the private sector is expected to take a lead to be involved in the business transaction. To this effect, cooperatives are becoming essential organizations to enhance bargaining power and enable the smallholder farmers fully benefit from the market transaction. They are giving service in agricultural input supply, product marketing and credit service for the farmers hence they do have considerable contribution in food security activities by increasing agricultural outputs and efficiency among the rural society (BoFED, 2006). Despite this fact, in Bure, there is only single milk cooperative. This cooperative has been established in 2007 G.C It has three

man powers (1 guard and 2 processors) The cooperative mainly collects milk from its members and non-member milk producers of Bure town. The cooperative has facilities such as refrigerator, manual churner with a capacity of churning 15 liters of milk, cream separator and plastic buckets. It collects an average of 5000 liters of milk per month and processes into cheese, skim milk, and butter. In the cooperative, the price of butter during fasting season is 55 ETB and 63 ETB during non-fasting periods. The collection price of milk was 350 and 400 ETB during fasting and non-fasting periods, respectively. The storage room of the milk center is a narrow room made of wood and mud. According to the chairman of the cooperative, the main problems of the cooperative were lack of electrical and efficient processing facilities, lack of land for establishment of other 61 collection and selling centers and production of improved pasture. The cooperative mainly sells its by- products to

consumers. The cooperative losses about 300 liters of butter milk and whey per month which otherwise has to be destined for animal consumption. This is due to lack of awareness amongst the cooperative members on the tradition of butter milk and whey provision to calves. The price of yoghurt (ergo) is 5 ETB per liter The selling price of a litter of skimmed milk and a kilogram of cheese is 3.00 ETB and 8 ETB respectively. 4.11 Effect of Feed Supplementation on Milk Yield and Composition of local cows 4.111 Chemical composition and in-vitro organic matter digestibility of treatment feeds The chemical composition and IVOMD of treatment feeds offered to experimental cows is presented in (Table 27). Fibrous crop residues and natural pastures in the dry season are of low nutritive value and below the quality to meet the nutritional requirement of livestock (Mesfin et al., 2009) Particularly, untreated wheat straw is generally characterized by low CP (3.9%), ether extract (EE) (16%), IVOMD

(380%), estimated ME (7.14 MJ/Kg), but high in neutral detergent fibre (NDF) (772%), acid detergent fibre (ADF) (48.2%) and lignin (79%) (EARO, 2004) The fibre content is higher than the value suggested limiting the feed intake of animals. The CP content was lower than the threshold required putting an animal in a positive nitrogen balance. Similar results were observed in this study from composition analysis of untreated wheat straw for CP, N, NDF, ADF, IVOMD and ME. The study also showed a considerable increase in nutrient content of wheat straw as a result of urea treatment of wheat straw. Ammoniating wheat straw with urea increased CP content (N*6.25) from 266 to 609% on DM basis (increased by 128.95%) due to retention of ammonia N (binding of ammonia) to the straw. In general, the response of wheat straw to urea treatment was very promising and was found to be comparable to previous results reported by Sundstøl (1978) and Cottyn and DeBoever (1988). Even though the amount of CP

gained in urea treated straw supplementation is below the minimum requirement (6.2%) when added to the CP gained from grazing, it is supposed 62 to satisfy the requirement of the individual cows. The percentage improvement in CP content of wheat straw due to urea treatment in this study is higher than the finding of Mesfin et al. (2007) in North shewa for urea treated teff straw (Ibid) which showed an increment from 4.3 to 89% (increased by 107%) The difference in the degree of improvement might be attributed to the variations in the type of silo used (under ground versus above ground), urea treatment and ensiling process. Similarly, the estimated metabolizable energy of urea treated wheat straw (8.45 MJ/kg DM) was higher than the figure obtained from untreated wheat straw (5.47 MJ/kg DM) Besides, the IVOMD of wheat straw was improved by 54.5% when treated with urea Table 27. Chemical composition, in-vitro organic matter digestibility and estimated metabolizable energy of

experimental feeds Measurements DM (%) UTWS TWS NC Offer Refusal 95.7 93.4 96.1 Concentrate Ground maize 95.2 92.3 92.1 % of DM Ash (%) 5.8 9.4 9.4 6.3 2.8 2.0 OM (%) 94.2 90.6 90.6 93.7 97.2 98.0 CP (%) 2.7 6.1 5.4 32.2 16.6 8.1 NDF (%) 81.5 38.1 32.6 12.00 15.5 13.9 ADF (%) 55.5 12.4 23.4 9.8 8.7 4.7 Hemicelluloses* (%) 26.0 25.6 9.2 2.1 6.7 9.2 IVOMD (%) 34.2 52.8 49.7 69.2 81.3 79.7 EME, MJ/kg* 0.55 0.8 0.8 1.1 1.30 1.27 *EME=0.16 (% IVOMD) as cited in McDonald et al (2002); Hemicellulose= % NDF - % ADF; NP= Natural pasture; UTWS=untreated wheat straw; TWS=treated wheat straw; NC=Noug seed cake; Dry matter and nutrient intake The dry matter intakes (DMI) of experimental cows are presented in Table 28. The DM, NDF and ADF intakes from supplemented feeds were significantly different (P<0.05) in the order of T3>T4>T2>T5 for NDF and ADF and T3>T2>T4>T5 for the DMI. The DMI of urea treated wheat

straw in local cows in this study was less than what Getu (2008) found 63 for crossbred cows. This difference might be attributed to the difference in breed of cows, nature of straw treatment, nature of the research (on-station versus on-farm) and research site (agro-ecology). The CPI of experimental cows supplemented with noug seed cake and urea treated wheat straw was higher (309g/day) followed by cows supplemented with sole noug seed cake (306.48g/day) and concentrate mixture (7655g/day) The metabolizable energy intakes (MEI) of experimental cows fed noug seed cake was the highest (10.47g/day) of all treatment groups Table 28. Dry matter and nutrients intake (g/day) from supplemented feeds by lactating local cows grazed on natural pasture Treatment TDMI CPI b MEI 306.48 b 10.47 NDFI a 333.03 ADFI c 58.44 ASHI c 59.01c T2 951.80 T3 956.6a 58.26d 8.03c 746.63a 180.70a 89.44a T4 904.93c 309.81a 10.06b 397.00b 77.46b 62.75b T5 461.40d 76.55c 6.00d

117.47d 54.08d 13.01d Mean 818.6825 187.775 8.64 398.5325 92.67 56.0525 SED 0.12 0.43 0.35 0.01 0.04 1.2 CV (%) 11.4 7.2 5.0 8.7 11.8 14.6 abcd = within colmns, means with different superscripts are significantly different (P<0.05); =T2=Nougcake; T3= ad libitum urea treated wheat straw; T4= Urea treated wheat straw + Noug seed cake; T5 = Concentrate (ground maize grain + noug seed kake +salt); TDMI = Total dry matter intake; CPI = Crude protein intake; MEI = Metabolisable energy intake; NDFI = Neutral detergent fibre intake; ADFI = Acid detergent fibre intake; and AshI =Ash dry matter intake 4.113 Body weight change of cows The body weight change data during the experimental period are presented in Table 29. In addition to improving milk yield, intervention diets showed either an increase in weight gain or no loss of weight of the experimental cows. In contrast, loss of weight was recorded in the control group. Particularly, more gain was recorded in noug

seed cake supplemented animals that resulted in a reduction in milk yield especially during the end of the experimental period. The reduction in milk yield in this group of cows might be 64 attributed to that nutrient were utilized for tissue accretion than for milk production. Even though, the correlation between DMI and weight gain was not significant at 5%, they were negatively correlated with Pearson coefficient of correlation -0.36 This might be due to the fact that highest portion of nutrient intakes might converted to milk than body tissues. Table 29. Effect of feed supplementation on body weight changes of local cows Treatment No. of cows Initial Wt. (kg) Final Wt. (kg) T1 4 237.25 236.25 -22.22e T2 4 228.00 229.25 27.78a T3 4 226.50 226.75 5.56c T4 4 230.00 230.00 0.00d T5 4 236.50 237.50 22.22b Mean 4 231.95 SED - 0.76 2.10 1.12 CV (%) - 7.60 5.80 8.20 231.95 BW change/treatment/day(g) 231.65 abcde = Means with different

superscripts with in columns are significantly different (P<0.05); T1=Control; T2=Noug seed cake; T3= Treated wheat straw; T4=Noug seed cake + treated wheat straw and T5=Concentrate; BW= body weight 4.114 Milk yield and composition All the cows used for this experiment were healthy during entire experimental period. Results of the effect of dietary treatments on the average daily milk yield (P<0.05) and compositions are presented in Table 30. Supplemented cows produced significantly more milk (P<0.05) than those grazed on natural pasture alone Similar results were also reported by Mesfin et al. (2009) and Getu (2008) indicating that crossbred cows fed urea treated teff straw and wheat straw, respectively and provided with supplemented diet had significantly higher milk yield than for non-supplemented animals of cross bred cows. The fat content of milk was higher (P<0.05) for T1 compared to T3 and T5, T2 and T4 also promoted more (P<0.05) fat content and total solids

than T3 This result is in contrast with the finding of Getu (2008) who found non-significant difference (p>0.05) for milk fat, milk protein, and total solids in urea treated wheat straw fed cows. However, treatment 65 effects were not-significantly different (p>0.05) for milk protein, solid-not-fat and ash contents. Dry matter intake was positively correlated with milk yield, protein, fat, and total solids contents of milk (Appendix 1 Table 4). In contrast, it was negatively correlated with total solids and ash composition of milk from the respective treatments. Table 30. Milk yield and milk composition from lactating local cows fed experimental feeds Treatment Mean yield(kg/day) Milk composition(%) Fat Protein TS SNF Ash T1 0.45b 5.02a 2.78a 12.63ab 850a 0.62a T2 1.61a 3.97ab 2.96a 14.35a 14.01a 0.66a T3 2.18 a 2.80c 3.05a 11.11b 8.65a 0.46a T4 1.51a 4.07ab 2.61a 13.19a 8.53a 0.59a T5 1.53a 3.60bc 2.67a 12.64ab 861a 0.63a Overall mean

1.46 3.89 2.81 12.79 9.66 0.59 SED 0.27 0.32 0.21 0.91 0.38 0.12 CV% 36.71 14.63 7.47 7.16 39.81 20.60 R2 0.66 0.76 0.61 0.72 0.48 0.48 abc = within column, means with different superscripts are significantly different (P<0.05); T1=Control; T2=Noug seed cake; T3= ad libitum urea treated wheat straw; T4= Urea treated wheat straw + Noug seed cake; T5 = Concentrate; SED = standard error of difference; CV%= coefficient of variation; TS=Total solids; SNF=Solid-Not-Fat. The lactation curve in (Figure 2) depicts the milk yield for a lactation period of 45 days. Even though concentrate fed cows are expected to perform better than other treatments, higher milk yield per day was recorded from cows fed urea treated wheat straw compared to other treatments followed by concentrate fed cows, while, low daily milk yield was recorded for the control group. This might be due to the higher DMI of cows supplemented with ad lib urea treated wheat straw. Cows in the control

group ceased to give milk starting from week 5 (day 28). This showed that unless we supplement lactating cows in cases of feed shortage, milk production will decline or completely dried off regardless of the stage of lactation. 66 Mean milk yield (litres/ per day) 2.5 2 Control 1.5 NC UTS 1 UTS+NC concentrate 0.5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Weeks Figure 2. Lactation curve of cows fed on experimental diets Figure 3 depicts the protein composition of milk from experimental cows at each phase of sampling. Milk from urea treated wheat straw fed cows had higher protein composition compared to other treatments. Milk samples from noug seed cake supplemented animals were the second in terms of protein composition with a slight decreasing trend to wards the end of the experimental period. Lowest protein composition was recorded for cows fed urea treated wheat straw and noug seed cake which might be due to the fact that when urea is provided with high protein diet its response will be less

(Prasad, 1989). Protein composition (%) 3.5 3 2.5 Control NC 2 UTS 1.5 NC+UTS CONCENTRATE 1 0.5 0 1 2 3 4 weeks Figure 3. Protein composition of milk samples taken at fortnight intervals 67 Figure 4 depicts the fat composition of milk samples from respective dietary treatments. The lowest fat composition of milk samples was recorded from cows fed noug seed cake. This agrees with the general notion that cows fed low roughage rations yield milk of lower fat composition compared to cows fed roughage diets. In other words, it is believed that the fat content is influenced more by roughage (fibre) intake (O’Connor, 1994). More over, the reported lowest figure for ADF and NDF content of noug seed cake evidenced this fact. In contrast, the highest fat composition was recorded for cows fed urea treated wheat straw. This might be due to a relatively higher ADF and NDF content of urea treated wheat straw diet which positively correlated with the amount of fat content of milk.

Cows fed urea treated wheat plus noug seed cake showed an initial increasing trend which then declined towards the end of the experimental period. This might be due to the reduction in response when urea treated straw is provided with feed with higher protein content. 7 Fat composition (%) 6 5 Control 4 NC UTS 3 NC+UTS 2 CONCENTRATE 1 0 1 2 3 4 Weeks Figure 4. Fat composition of milk samples taken at fortnight intervals Figure 5 depicts the total solids composition of milk samples. Except for the control group, milk samples from other dietary treatments showed a drastic decrease and then consistent values towards the end of the experiment. 68 Total solids composition (%) 30 25 20 Control NC 15 UTS NC+UTS 10 5 0 1 2 3 4 Weeks Figure 5. Total solids composition of milk samples taken at fortnight intervals Figure 6 depicts the solid not fat composition of milk samples. Similar to the total solid content, the solid-non-fat composition of milk samples from

noug seed cake and urea treated wheat straw showed a declining trend that might be due to the advancement of the stage of lactation (O’ Connor, 1993). Solid-not-fat from the control dietary treatment showed an increasing trend, while, solid-not-fat composition of milk samples from cows fed urea treated wheat straw and noug seed cake is almost constant (except a slight decline during the beginning of the experiment) which asserts that nutrition major effect on milk composition and underfeeding reduces the amount milk production, the fat and solids-not-fat (SNF) contents of milk produced (O’Connor, 1993). Solids-not-fat composition (%) 45 40 35 CONCENTRATE 30 Control 25 NC 20 UTS 15 NC+UTS 10 CONCENTRATE 5 0 1 2 3 Weeks Figure 6. Solids-not-fat content of milk samples 69 4 Figure 7 depicts the ash composition of milk samples. Ash composition showed an increasing trend except milk samples from cows fed adlib urea treated wheat straw during the beginning of the

experimental period. However, it started to decline till the end of the experiment. In contrast, ash composition of milk samples from cows fed urea treated wheat straw showed a drastic decrease and then a slight increment. The lowest ash composition was recorded for milk samples from cows fed noug seed cake that might be attributed to variations due to the individuality of the cow. 0.9 Ash composition (%) 0.8 0.7 Control 0.6 NC 0.5 UTS 0.4 NC+UTS 0.3 CONCENTRATE 0.2 0.1 0 1 2 3 4 Weeks Figure 7. Ash composition of milk samples taken at fortnight intervals 4.114 Economic evaluation of treatment feeds The cost of grazing for the control group was not considered, while the total cost of production (feeds, urea, and material including plastic sheet used for sealing the treated straw) was considered since other variable costs (medicaments) were the same for the entire treatment groups. The net profit increased from ETB 180/cow/day in T1 to ETB 5.20/cow/day in T2; ETB

813/cow/day in T3; ETB 538 in T4; and ETB 564 for T5 Hence, this study demonstrated that feeding the intervention diets to local milk cows increased the net profit for farmers to ETB 3.40/cow/day (T2), ETB 633/cow/day (T3), ETB 358 /cow/day (T4), ETB 3.84/cow/day over the farmers’ practice (Table 31) The highest economic benefit was gained from feeding of urea treated wheat straw which is really an 70 advantage for small holder farmers who have better access to crop residue resources than concentrates. In this regard, it is worth mentioning that the variable cost incurred during the ensiling process can even be minimized by using alternative ensiling facilities which are under farmers holding. In contrast, the highest cost per cow per day and a relatively less milk yield was gained from feed ing of noug seed cake which was accompanied by lowest economic return to other treatments. Table 31. Economic evaluation of experimental feeds fed to lactating local milk cows Costs and

benefits Feed treatments Cost of feeds and milk (ETB) T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 Cost of urea (ETB) - - 13.00 - - Cost of plastic (ETB) - - 30.00 - - Cost of labor (ETB) - - 15.00 - - Cost of NC (ETB) - 90.00 - 45.00 - - - Cost of straw treatment (ETB) Cost of Concentrate(noug seed cake + maize grain + salt) (ETB) 33.05 Total Variable cost (ETB) 0.00 3600 23200 18000 132.20 Cost /cow/experimental period (ETB) 0.00 9000 5800 45.00 33.05 Cost/cow/day (ETB) 0.00 2.00 1.29 1.00 0.73 Mean kg of milk per treatment per day 0.45 1.61 2.18 1.51 1.53 Cost /cow/kg of milk (ETB) 0.00 1.24 0.59 0.66 0.48 1.80 6.44 8.72 6.04 6.12 1.80 5.20 8.13 5.38 5.64 - 3.40 6.33 3.58 3.84 Gross income from sale of milk/treatment/day (ETB)* Net profit (ETB) Net profit over the control/treatment/day (ETB) * Price per litre of milk fixed to be 4 ETB; ETB=Ethiopian Birr T1=Grazing; T2= Noug seed cake; T3=Urea treated wheat straw T4=Noug seed cake +

urea treated wheat straw; T5 concentrate 71 4.115 Farmers perception Even though there were attempts to provide supplements and treated straws for fattening purposes, participant farmers had no tradition of providing urea treated straws and other protein supplements such as noug seed cake to their milk animals. Participant farmers showed enthusiastic interest to utilize efficiently even untreated wheat straw was not used efficiently before this feeding trial. They have witnessed that this trial has taught them wise use of wheat straw resources in the district. Besides, farmers appreciated the increment in milk yield during peak feed shortage season when local cows otherwise would get dried off. In other words, farmers realized that feed supplements had brought milk yield increment and extended the lactation length of the experimental cows. Moreover, the body condition of supplemented cows was improved during the experimental period, except for cows fed urea treated wheat straw

plus noug seed cake (in which minimal weight change in cows was recorded). According to the participant farmers, provision of noug seed cake has also brought about a change in the texture (less granulated) of butter fat and a decreased in its amount. This was also confirmed scientifically in the trend of fat composition of milk samples taken from cows at a fortnight interval during the experimental period. 72 5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS As a conclusion, from this study it was noted that the existing milk production systems (mainly extensive) & marketing (mainly informal) systems are interwoven by many constraints related to feed, nutrition, health, breed, breeding practice, handling, processing and marketing of products predominates in the study district. On- farm evaluation of feed supplements at Wangedam kebele showed a significant difference (P<0.05) between the treatment groups in terms of response in milk yield and composition of milk fat and total solids.

Besides, economic evaluation of feed treatments showed that the intervention diet to local milk cows increased the net profit for farmers to ETB 3.40/cow/day (T2), ETB 6.33/cow/day (T3), ETB 358 /cow/day (T4), ETB 384 /cow/day (T5) over the farmers’ practice. In this regard, Urea treated wheat straw supplementation was found to be the highest in terms of milk yield, weight gain and economic return. In general, having this background, it can be inferred that the milk industry is at its infant stage compared to the existing milk potential of the area. Milk marketing system in the area was characterized by under developed and inefficient type of market for both milk and butter. The existing situations with regard to milk production service sector were not also encouraging. Extension service in line with improving milk production (AI, veterinary services, introducing improved cattle breeds), credit and market information were very weak. Dietary treatments were also economically viable,

statistically significant and socially acceptable in terms of their effect on milk yield. Therefore, the government and other concerned bodies should pay due attention to promote intensive milk production systems and develop formal milk and milk product marketing systems in Bure district. To be specific, further works are needed in areas of nutrition, health, milk and milk product marketing, input delivery & services and scaling up the feeding package developed in this study considering the respective milk production systems to capitalize market oriented milk industry in the district. From this study, among many issues come across, since the on-farm trial was under taken only in mid-altitude, it is suggested that the effect of concentrate and urea treated wheat straw supplementation should be evaluated in different agro-ecologies. 73 6. REFERENCES Adebabay Kebede, Keralem Ejigu, Tessema Aynalem and Abebe Jenberie, 2008. Beekeeping in the Amhara region. Available on

http://WWWeiargovet Ahmed M., Ehui S and Yemesrach Assefa, 2003 Milk development in Ethiopia Socioeconomics and policy research. Working paper 58 ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute), Nairobi, Kenya. 47p Ahmed, M. M, S Ehui and Yemesrach Assefa, 2004 Milk development in Ethiopia International Food Policy Institute. Available on: http: /www.ifpriorg/dius/eptd/dp/papers/eptdp123pdf Alberro, M., 1983 Comparative performance of F1 Friesian x zebu heifers in Ethiopia Animal Production, 37: pp. 247-252 Alemu Yami, Zinash Sileshi and Seyoum Bediye, 1991. The potential of crop residues and agro-industrial by-products as animal feed. In: proceedings of ESAP, 3rd National Improvement Conference. 24-26 May 1989 IAR, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia pp. 57-63 Alganesh Tola, 2002. Traditional milk and milk products handling practices and raw milk quality in Eastern Wollega. MSc Thesis, Alemaya University, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia. 108p AOAC, 1990. (Association of Analytical Chemists) Official

methods of analysis 15th edition. AOAC Inc, Arlington, Virginia, USA Asaminew Tassew, 2007. Production, handling, traditional processing practices and quality of milk in Bahir Dar milk shed Area, Ethiopia. MSc Thesis Alemaya University, Ethiopia. 74 Asheber Sewalem, 1992. Evaluation of the reproductive and pre-weaning growth performance of Fogera and their F1 Fresian crosses at Andassa cattle breeding station, Ethiopia. MSc Thesis Alemaya University, Ethiopia Azage Tegegne, Geleto A., PO Osuji, Tesfu Kassa and J Frnaceschini, 1994 Influence of dietary supplementation and partial sucking on body weight, lactation and reproduction performance of primiparous Boran (Bos indicus) cows in Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Science (Cambridge). 123 (2): 267-273 Azage Tegegne and Alemu G/Wold. 1998 Prospects for peri-urban milk development in Ethiopia. In: Proceedings of 5th National Conference of Ethiopian Society of Animal Production (ESAP), 15-17 1997, Addis Ababa. Ethiopia, pp 248

Azage Tegegne, Tsehay Redda, Alemu Gebre Wold and Hizkias K., 2001 Milk recording and herd registration in Ethiopia. pp 90-104 In: Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference of the Ethiopian Society of Animal Production (ESAP). 24-26 August, 2000. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Azage Tegegne.2003 Financing market- oriented milk development- the Case of Ada’aLiben district Milk and Milk Products Marketing Association, Ethiopia Urban Agriculture Magazine 9:25-27. Azage Tegegne, Workneh Ayalew, Berhanu Gebre Medhin and Salvador FernandezRivera, 2003. Opportunities for improving milk production in Ethiopia pp 107-122 Presented in Ethio-Forum 2002. Resource management for poverty reduction: Approaches and technologies. Ethiopian Social Rehabilitation and Development Fund. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Belete Anteneh, 2006. Studies on cattle milk and meat production in Fogera district: Production systems, constraints and opportunities for development. MSc Thesis University of Hawassa, Awassa, Ethiopia.

Berhanu Gebiremedhin, Fernandez-Rivera S., Mohammed Hassena, Mwangi W, Seid Ahmed, 2007. Maize and livestock: Their inter-linked roles in meeting human 75 needs in Ethiopia. Research Report 6 ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute), Nairobi ,Kenya. 103 pp Beyene Kebede and Galal, E.SE, 1982 A study of body weight from birth to one year of age in European-zebu crossbred cattle in Ethiopia. Animal production 34: 85-93 BOARD (Bureau of Agriculture and Rural development), 2005. Livestock feeding strategy manual. Bahir Dar “In Amharic” BoFED (Bureau of Finance and Economic Development), 2005. Development indicators of Amhara Region. 3th ed Bahir Dar, Ethiopia BoFED (Bureau of Finance and Economic Development), 2006. Development indicators of Amhara region. 4th ed Bahir Dar, Ethiopia Cottyn, B. J and J L De Boever, 1988 Up grading of straw by ammoniation Animal Feed Science & Technology. 21: 38-48 CSA (Central Statistical Agency), 2005. Federal Democratic Republic of

Ethiopia Agricultural sample survey. Livestock and livestock characteristics bulletin, Volume II. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Debrah, S. and Berhan Anteneh 1991 Milk marketing in Ethiopia: Markets of first sale and producers market patterns. ILCA Research Report 19, ILCA (International Livestock Centre for Africa), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. EARO (Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organization), 2004. Training on: Recent Development in Animal Feeds and Nutrition organized for agricultural experts in West, SouthWest, and North Shewa zones by Research & Extension division and Feeds &Nutrition division of Holetta Research Center. May 10-11,2004, Holetta, Ethiopia. 40p Exxun, 2008. Economy overview http:/wwwexxunco /Ethiopia/e-echtml Retrieved on 22 Sept, 2008. 76 FAO, 2001a. (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) Agriculture database system. Available on: http://wwwfaoorg/agristathtml Firew Tegegne, 2007. Evaluation of alternative feed resources for ruminants under

arid zones of the tropics and sub-tropics: the case of cactus pear (Oppuntia ficus-indica) in Ethiopia. PhD Thesis Humboldt University of Berlin, Germany Fiseha Mogess, 2009. Studies on production and marketing systems of local chicken ecotypes in Bure district, North-West Amhara. Msc Thesis, Hawassa University, Hawassa. Gebre Egziabher Gebre Yohannes, Tesfaye Kumsa, Alganesh Tola and Chernet Asfaw, 2000. Effects of sucking on calf pre-weaning growth and cow reproduction in Horro and crossbred cows. pp 212-216 In: Proceeding of the 7th Annual Conference of the Ethiopian Society of Animal Production (ESAP). 26-27 May, 1999. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Getachew Felleke and Gashaw Geda, 2001. The Ethiopian milk development policy: a draft policy document. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Ministry of Agriculture/AFRDRD/AFRDT Food and Agriculture Organization/SSFF. 101p Getachew Felleke, 2003. A Review of the small scale milk sector in Ethiopia FAO prevention of food losses programme. Milk and milk

products, post-harvest losses and food safety in Sub-saharan Africa and the Near East. Available on: http://www.faoorg/ag/againfo/projects/en/pf1/docs/P1assessmentcoverethiopia pdf. Getu Kitaw, 2008. Replacement of formulated concentrate mix with vetch (Vicia dasycarpa) hay to Lactating crossbred dairy cows fed on urea treated wheat straw. M.Sc Thesis, Alemaya University, Ethiopia 77 Gidey, 2001. Assessment of calf crop productivity and total herd life of fogera cows at Andassa Ranch in North Western Ethiopia. MSc Thesis, Alemaya University, Ethiopia. Goshu, M. 1981 Evaluation of indigenous strains for milk production In: Summary of Animal Production Research (1968-1980). December, 1981 Addis Ababa University and Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Centre. Hailemariam, M. and Kassa Mersha, 1994 Genetic and environmental effects on age at first calving and calving interval of naturally bred Boran (zebu) cows in Ethiopia. Animal Production, 58: 329-334 Holloway G., C, Nicholson, C

Delgado, Sstall and S Ethui 2000 How to make a milk market: A case study from the Ethiopian Highlands. Socio-economics and policy Research working paper 28. ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute) Nairobi, Kenya, 28 pp. ILCA, 1987. (International Livestock Centre for Africa) ILCA Research Report Number 16. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 45p ILCA, 1989. (International Livestock Centre for Africa) ILCA Annual Report ILCA, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 45p ILCA (International Livestock Centres for Africa). 1990 Livestock Systems Research Kearl, L.C 1982 Nutrient requirement of ruminants in developing countries International Feedstuffs Institute, Utah Agricultural Experiment Station, Utah State University, Longman 84322. USA 381 pp ILCA, 1993. (International Livestock Centre for Africa) A hand book of African livestock statistics. Working document No 15 ILCA, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 63p Kedija Husien, 2008. Characterization of milk production system and opportunity for market orientation: A Case

Study of Mieso District, Oromia Region, Ethiopia. MSc Thesis. Haramaya University, Ethiopia 78 Keralem Ejigu, 2005. Honeybee production systems, opportunities and challenges in enebse Esar midir wereda (Amhara region) and Amaro Special Wereda (Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples Region), Ethiopia. MSc Thesis, Alemaya University, Ethiopia. Ketema, H. and Tsehay, R 2004 Milk production systems in Ethiopia Ministry of Agriculture, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Kiwuwa, G.H, Trail, JCM, Kurtu, MY, Worku, G, Anderson, FM and Durkin, J.1983 Crossbred dairy cattle productivity in Arsi region, Ethiopia ILCA Research Report No.11 ARDU and ILCA, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Marth, E.H (ed), 1978 Standard methods for the examinations of milk products American Public Health Association, Washington, DC. 416p McDonald, P., R A Edwards, J F D Greenhalgh, C A Morgan, 2002 Animal Nutrition (6th ed.) Pearson Educational Limited Edinburgh, Great Britain 544p. McDowell, R. E, 1971 Feasibility of commercial

milking with cattle indigenous to the tropics. Cornell International Agricultural Development Bulletin No 21 Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA. 22 pp Mesfin Dejene, Seyoum Bediye*, Aemiro Kehaliw, Getu Kitaw and Kedir Nesha, 2009: On-farm evaluation of lactating crossbred (Bos taurus x Bos indicus) milk cows fed a basal diet of urea treated teff (Eragrostis tef) straw supplemented with escape protein source during the dry season in crop-livestock production system of north Shewa, Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development Volume 21, Article #61. Retrieved April 5, 2009, from http://www.lrrdorg/lrrd21/5/deje21061htm Mohamed A.M Ahmed, Simeon Ehui, and Yemesrach Assefa, 2004 Milk development in Ethiopia. EPTD Discussion Paper No 123 Washington DC, USA 79 Mukasa-Mugerwa, E., 1989 A review of reproductive performance of Bos indicus cattle ILCA Monograph No. 6, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia O’Connor, C.B, 1993 Traditional cheese making manual No1 ILCA (International

Livestock Centre for Africa), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 43p O’Connor, C.B, 1994 Rural dairy technology ILRI training manual No 1 International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 133p O’Connor, C.B 1995 Rural Milk Technology Training Manual Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Prasad, 2002. Principles and Practices of Dairy Farm Management (6th ed) Newdelhi, India. Preston, T. R, 1986a Strategies for optimizing the utilization of crop residues and agroindustrial byproducts for livestock feeding in the tropics pp145-166 In: ARNAB (African Research Network for Agricultural byproducts), towards optimal feeding of agricultural byproducts to livestock in Africa: proc.of workshop held at the university of Alexandria, Egypt, October 1985. ILCA, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Preston, T. R and A R Leng, 1986b Supplementation of diets based on fibrous residues and by-products. pp373-413 In: F Sundstøl and E Owens (eds), straw and other fibrous by-products as feeds. Development in animal and

veterinary sciences (The Netherlands). No14 Elsevier science publisher BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Preston, T. R and R A, Leng, 1987 Matching ruminant production systems with available resources in the tropics and sub-tropics. Penambul Books, Armidale, Australia, 259p. Rai, M.M, 1985 Milk chemistry and animal nutrition Kalyani publishers New DelhiLudhiana pp 3-125 80 Rehrahie Mesfin, 2001. Biological and economical evaluation of feeding urea treated teff and barley straw based diets to crossbred milk cows in the highlands of Ethiopia. M.Sc Thesis Swedish University of Agricultural science, Uppsala, Sweden Richardson, G. H, 1985 Standard methods for the examination of milk products 15th ed American Public Health Association. Washington, D C pp 168-196 SAS (Statistical Analysis System), 1999. Statistical analysis system Institute, SAS/STAT user Guide, Version 8.1, SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, 1999 Schaar T., E Brannang and L B Meskel, 1981 Breeding activity of Ethio-Swedish

integrated rural development project. Part II Milk production of Zebu and crossbred cattle. Wld Anim Rev 31: 31-36 SDDP (Smallholder Milk Development Project), 1999. Calf and heifer rearing SDDP extension manual No.3 Ministry of Agriculture, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia SDDP, 2000. Crop improvement Methods SDDP extension manual No3 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Sethumadhavan. T P, 2004 Sustainable milk farming: An overview New Delhi, India Seyoum Bediye, Zinash Sileshi and Dereje Fekadu, 2007. Chemical composition and nutritive values of Ethiopian feeds. Research Report No 73 Institute of Agricultural Research (IAR), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 33 pp. Sintayehu Yigrem, Fekadu Beyene, Azage Tegegne and Berhanu Gebremedhin, 2008. Dairy production, processing and marketing systems of Shashemene–Dilla area, South Ethiopia. IPMS (Improving Productivity and Market Success) of Ethiopian Farmers Project Working Paper 9. ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute), Nairobi, Kenya. 62 pp 81 Sundstøl,

F., E Coxworth and D N Mowat, 1978 Improving the nutritive value of wheat straw & other low quality roughages by treatment with ammonia. World Anim Rev.,26:13-21 Solomon Bogale, 2004. Assessment of livestock production systems and feed resources base in Sinana and Dinsho districts of Bale highlands, Southeast Oromia. M Sc Thesis. Alemaya University, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia 141pp Swenson, C., Schaar, J, Brännäng, E & Meskel, LB, 1981 Breeding activities of the Ethio–Swedish integrated rural development project. Part III Reproductive performance of zebu and crossbred cattle. World Animal Review 38, 31–36 Tadesse Bekele, Yohannes Gojam, Zelalem Yilma and Yoseph Shiferaw, 2005. Growth performance of crossbred calves reared on skim milk as partial milk replacer. In: The role of agricultural universities/colleges in education, research and development in Ethiopia: challenges and opportunities. Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference of the Ethiopian Society of Animal Production

(ESAP) held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, August 25-27, 2005. Tesfaye Mengistie, 2007. Characterization of cattle milk and meat production, processing and marketing system in Metema district, Ethiopia. MSc Thesis, Hawasa University, Hawasa, Ethiopia. Tilley, J. M A and R A Terry, 1963 A two-stage technique for in-vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18:104 Tsehay Redda, 1998. Prospects of Ethiopian milk development pp 149-159 In: Proceeding of the role of village milk cooperatives in milk development: Prospects for improving milk in Ethiopia. 22-24 April 1998, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Tsehay Redda, 2001. Small-scale milk marketing and processing in Ethiopia In: proceeding of the south-south workshop on smallholder milk production and marketing: constraints and opportunities, Anand, India. 12-16 March 82 Yigzaw Desalegne and Kahsay Berhe. 2007 Bure pilot learning district diagnosis and program design. Unpublished Yoseph Mekasha, Azage Tegegne, Alemu

Yami, and N. N Ummuna, 2003 Variations in nutrient intake of milk cows and feed Balance in urban and peri-urban systems in Ethiopia. pp 177-184 In: Proceedings of 10th Annual Conference of the Ethiopian Society of Animal Production (ESAP). August 22-24, 2002, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Van Soest, P. Jand J B Robertson, 1985 Analysis of forage and fibrous foods A laboratory manual for animal science 613 Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA. Wambugu, n.d Extension and Its effect on milk cattle nutrition and productivity In smallholder milk Enterprises In Kiambu District. University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya. Winrock. 1989 Conducting on-farm animal research: Procedures and economic analysis National printers Ltd, Singapore. Woldemichael Somano, 2008. Milk marketing chains analysis: The Case of Shashemane, Hawassa and Dale district’s milk shed, Southern Ethiopia. MSc Thesis Hawassa University, Ethiopia. Zegeye Yigezu, 2003. Imperative and challenges of milk production, processing and

marketing in Ethiopia. pp 61-67 In: Proceedings of 10th Annual Conference of the Ethiopian Society of Animal Production (ESAP). August 22-24, 2002, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Zelalem Yilma and Ledin Inger, 2001. Milk production, processing, marketing and the role of milk and milk products on smallholder farmers’ income in the central highlands of Ethiopia. pp 139-154 In: Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference of the Ethiopian Society of Animal Production (ESAP). 24-26 August, 2000, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 83 7. APPENDICES 84 Appendix 1. Mean chemical composition and ANOVA procedure for mean milk yield of experimental cows Appendix 1 Table 1. Mean chemical composition of milk from respective treatments Chemical composition Control UTS NC UTS+NC CON CP 2.78 2.96 2.78333 284 2.86 Fat 3.67 4.4 2.8 3.62 3.61 TS 10.91 18.42 13.78 14.37 15.52 SNF 7.24 14.02 10.98 10.75 11.91 Ash 0.52 0.66 0.46 0.55 0.55 Appendix 1 Table 2. ANOVA procedure for mean

milk yield of experimental cows SV DF SS Mean square F value Pr>F model 7 6.76 0.96 3.37 0.03 Diets 4 6.29 1.57 5.49 0.001 Replications 3 0.47 1.16 0.55 0.66 Error 12 3.44 0.29 Total 19 Appendix 1 Table 3. ANOVA procedures for private pasture land holdings among sampled kebeles of Bure district Source SS DF Mean Square F Sig. Corrected Model .518 a 6 0.086 1.46 0.19 Intercept 1.078 1 1.078 18.18 0.00 Kebeles 0.518 6 0.086 1.46 0.19 Error 10.26 173 0.059 Total 11.70 180 Corrected Total 10.77 179 a. R Squared = 048 (Adjusted R Squared = 015) 85 Appendix 1 Table 4. DMI correlations with milk yield, milk composition & weight change of experimental cows Variables DMI* Weight change -0.4 Milk yield 0.4 Protein 0.6 Fat -0.5 Total solids 0.1 Solid-not-fat 0.4 Ash -0.4 *Correlations are not significant at 5% Appendix 2. Figures of cattle husbandry practices in Bure district Figure 8. Feeding crossbred

cattle at Bure town (left); local cattle grazing maize stover aftermaths at Wangedam kebele (right) of Bure district 86 Figure 9. Night shelters at Alefa kebele/left/ and Bure town/right/ of Bure district Figure 10. Feeding trough and watering equipments used by milk producers of Bure district 87 Figure 11. Communal grazing land at Bekotabo kebele (left) and Alefa kebele (right) of Bure district Figure 12. Maize stover conservation practice and pumpkin as livestock feed at Bekotabo Kebele Bure district 88 Figure 13. Transporting hay to homestead at Wangedam (left); hay stacked at Bure town (right) of Bure district Figure 14. Cattle trekking to watering points at Wundigi (left); watering of cattle at Bure town (right) of Bure district Figure 15. Woman milk producer at Fetam-Sentom (left); calves housed at Bure town (right) of Bure district 89 Figure 16. Natural (Bull) service at Alefa kebele/left/; local Bull at Bure town/right/ of Bure district Figure 17: Milk

equipment cleaning and sun drying in Bure district Figure 18. Churner at Bure Damot Cooperative (left); churning at Bekotabo Kebele (right) of Bure district 90 Appendix 3. Questionnaire on characterization of milk production and marketing systems Date PA Altitude m asl I-Farm household Characteristics 1-Name of respondent 2-Number of years lived in this area (years) 3-Relegion of household head (HHH) 1-Orthodox 2-Muslim 3-Protestant 4-Traditional 5-Catolic 6-Other Specify 1-Male Female-2 Widow –3 Divorced - 4 4-Sex of household head 5- Marital status Married – 1 Single – 2 Not relevant-5 6-Age of the household head (yrs) 1. < 20 220-29 3 30-39 4 40-49 5 50-59 6 > 60 7- Educational level of the household Sex and age group Educational level1 1. Household head 2. Spouse 3. Sons <7 years 4. Sons 7-15 years 5.

Sons 16-30 years 6. Daughter <7 years 7. Daughter 7-15 years 8. Daughter 16-30 years 9. Others (specify) 91 1 . a Illiterate b Read and Write c Elementary school d High school e Diploma and above: NB For more than one choice please write the code plus the number of household members in bracket. 8. Household size and composition Sex Age group in years <7 7-15 16-30 31-60 >60 1. Male 2. Female Total 9-Position of the household head in the community Political Leader – 1 spiritual leader –2 elder-3 Member – 4 other (specify) -------II- Resource Endowment and Uses Land ownership and use 1-Total farm size (ha /‘Geisha’/ ‘Kert’/ other local unit (specify) Grazing (unit) Back yard farm (unit) Fallow (unit) Other (specify) (unit) Rent-out (unit) 2- Landholdings (ha /head) Crop production Back yard Pasture production Forest Private grazing land Other (specify)

Cultivated pasture 3. Number of farmers using in a specified communal grazing land B- Off-farm activity 92 4. Indicate the type of off-farm activities performed by any one of your family members in 2000 E.C Person performing 1 Off-farm Income obtained in Birr/year activities performed 1 2 3 4 5 1 Household head-1 Wife-2 Husband-3 Male chilled-4 Female chiled-5 Male adult-6 Female adult-7 other specify-8 III. Milk Production Systems 1. What are your major livestock activities? a. Milk production b Small ruminant production c poultry production 2. Which part of your livestock activity contributes most of your families’ income? a. Milk production b Small ruminant production c poultry production 3. How long have you engaged in milk production? 4. Livestock ownership & demography Type Number Blood level2 Origin3 Purpose4 Local cows Crossbred cows Local oxen Crossbred oxen Local heifers Crossbred heifers Local bulls Crossbred

bulls Local calves 2 . Blood level:1 Local X exotic 2 Back cross to local 3 Back cross with exotic 4 Advanced crosses (>75%) N.B: for more than one choice please writ the code plus the number of cattle in bracket . 1 Parent 2born inherited 3 Purchase 4 Gift 5 Other NB: For more than one choice please writ the code plus the number of animals in bracket. 4 . Rank in decreasing order of importance a maximum of 3 main purposes of keeping each livestock category: 1Milk 2 Meat 3.drought power 4 Transportation 5 manure 6 dowry and gift 7 reproduction 8 Other (specify) 3 95 Crossbred calves Sheep Goats Chicken Horses Donkeys Mules Honeybee colony A. Feeds and Feeding 1. Could you mention a maximum of three main types for each of the following classes of feeds you are using for milk cows? (In decreasing order of importance) Classes of feeds 1 2 3 1. Improved forages 2. Crop residues 3. Mineral sources 4. Supplements (concentrates) 5. Others (specify) 2. Is there a problem of

feed shortage for milk cows? 1 Yes 2 No 3. If yes, when? 4. If yes, how do you cope up with feed shortage in your locality? 5. If yes, what are the main problems in the area of pasture land availability for milk cows? 1. Overstocking 2 Low productivity of pasture land 3 Shortage of land 4 Utilization by other livestock type 5. Combination of them (specify) 6 Others (specify) 6. What are the main problems in the area of hay availability for milk cows? 1. Shortage 2 Utilization by other livestock type 3 Combination of them 4 Other (specify) 7. What are the main problems in the area of improved forage availability for milk cows? 1. Unawareness 2 Lack of seed 3 Lack of growing land 4 Poor adaptability 5. Combination of them (specify) 6 Other (specify) 8. What are the main problems in the area of concentrate feed availability for milk cows? 94 1. Unawareness 2 Lack of access 3 Costly 4 Combination of them (specify)

5. Others (specify) 9. What are the main problems in the area of crop residue availability for milk cows? 1. Shortage of production 2 Utilization by other livestock type 3 Shortage due utilization for other purpose other than feed 4. Combination of them (specify) 5.Others (specify) 10. Which cop residue is your dominant feed? 1. Teff straw 2 Barley straw 3 Rice straw 4Maize stalk 11. To which classesof cattle do you give relatively more feed than grazing in time of sever feed shortage? 1. Milking cows 2 Milking + pregnant cows 3 Pregnant cows 4 Dry cows 5. Draught oxen 6 Others (specify) 12. In what form are you using the natural grazing lands you have? 1. Continuous grazing 2 Rotational grazing 3 Cut-and-carry system 13. Would you mention the average price of purchased feeds? Feedstuffs Source5 Average price/100Kg 1. Hay 2. Green grass 3. Noug seed cake 4. Wheat bran 5. Salt (Nacl) Crop residues 6. Others (specify)

14. Do you conserve feeds to feed milk cows in times of feed shortage? 1Yes 2 No 15. If yes, mention the types of feeds that you conserve: 16. If no, Why not 17. Do you supplement your lactating animals? 1 yes 2 no 18. How do you provide supplementary feeds? 1. Separately 2 Group feeding 3 Others (specify) 5 . Source: a farmer b oil factory c floor factory d Brewery factory e others 95 19. If yes, could you please mention to which classes of milk cows, type of feed and season/month they are offered? Classes of milk cattle Dry season Rainy season Frequency of supplementing6 1. calves 2. heifers 3. lactating cows 4. pregnant cows 5. dry cows 6. bulls 7. draught oxen 8. others (specify) 20. Do you exercise know urea treatment? 1 Yes 2 No 21. If yes, which type of crop residue do you treat? 22. Do you prepare multi nutrient block (MNB) to provide for your milk cows? 1. Yes 2 No 23. How frequently do you

provide water for your cattle? Class and breed of cattle Watering Frequency 1. Free access 2. once per day 1. Local milking cows 2. Crossbred milking cows 3. Local calves 4. Crossbred calves 6 . 1 Once a day 2. Twice a day 3. As available 96 3. twice per day 4 Every other day 24. Source of water at different seasons of a year Water source Seasons Distance of water source from Month(s) of the homestead in km for a trip of availability water 1. 2. 3. Dry Rainy round 7 year 1.Tap water 2. Rain 3. Wells 4. Pond 5. River 6. Others (specify) 25. What is your water related problem? 1 Scarcity/unavailability 2 Parasites 3 Impurities 4. Distance 26. Do you practice semi-sedentary type of livestock rearing in search of feed and water? 1. Yes 2 No 27. If yes, would you mention the place, the distance in km and the period you leave your homestead for semi-sedentary type? 1. Place 2 Distance in km 3 Period in month’s 28. How many of your

household members move around with your animals? Persons Number 1. Whole family 2. Men 3. Women 4. Children 7 . Codes for months: 1 January 2 Feb 3 March 4 Apr 5 May 6 June 7 July 8 Aug 9 Sept 10 Oct 11. Nov 12 Dec NB: For more than one choice with in a row write possible code 97 29. What was the reason for the last year you moved away? Reasons 1. Yes 2 No If yes, when8? 1. Drought 2. Water logging 3. Shortage of the grazing land 4. Others (specify) 30. How frequently do you provide salt? 1. Free access at any time 2 Daily 3every other day 4 Once per week 5 Less than every two weeks 6. Others (specify) B. Calf Rearing Practices 1. Do you wean your calf? 1 Yes 2 No 2. If yes, at what age do you wean the calf (in months)? Local Crossbred 1. Male 2. Female 3. If yes, which type of weaning do you exercise? a. Partial weaning b. abrupt weaning c Other (specify) 4. Who weans the calf mostly? 1. The cow refusal

2 Owner 3 Refusal of the calf due to lack of milk 4 Others (specify) 5. If the owner does weaning, explain the reason? 1. To get more milk 2 Prepare the cow for mating 3 Give rest time for next calving 4 Combination of them 5. Others (specify) 6. System of weaning exercised by the owner? 1. Isolation and herding separately 2 Protection from sucking with out isolation 3. Other (specify) 7. What method do you use for pre-weaning milk feeding? a. Bucket feeding (for local, cross or both) b Partial suckling (for local, cross or 98 both) c. Other (for local, cross or both) 8. Do you provide colostrums for your newborn calf? 1 Yes 2 No 9. If no, why 10. For how long is the newborn calf supplied with milk (In months)? 1. Local 2 Crossbred 11. For how long newborn calves stay indoors until they start grazing? 1. Local Cross 12. Do you provide supplementary

feed to newborn calf till they start grazing? 1. Yes 2 No 13. If yes, mention the type of feed and form of feeding? Type of feed 1. Local Form of feeding (group or individual) 2. Crossbred C. Housing, Facilities and Management 1. Where do you keep milking cows, calves and heifers at different season of the year? Dry season Rainy season Local calves Crossbred calves Local cows Crossbred cows Local heifers Crossbred heifers 99 2. House types and facilities House & facilities Breed of milking cows Local 1. House type Roof Crossbred grass/straw Corrugated metal sheet Wall Mud + wood Dung + wood Stone Floor Earthen Stone Cemented House Water

trough (WT) 2. facilities Feeding Trough (FT) WT + FT No facilities 3. Specify the area of the barn you have (m2) 4. Frequency of cleaning the barn 1. Three times a day 2 Two times a day 3 Once a day 4 Others (specify) 5. How do you dispose the cattle dung from the barn 1 Draining system 2 labor 6. Frequency of disposing manure from the barn 1. Once per day 2 Twice a day 3 Three times a day 3 Three times and above 100 7. What type of herding management do you have for your milk cattle? (if it is in both dry and rainy season select both for specified milking cattle) Management type Day Time Calves Dry season Night time Rainy Dry season Rainy season season 1. Grazing 2.Tethering 3. Stall feeding 4. Others (specify) Local cows 1. Grazing 2.Tethering 3. Stall feeding 4. Others (specify) Crossbred cows 1. Grazing 2.Tethering 3. Stall feeding 4. Others (specify) 8. If they graze for how long they stay in grazing (hours per day)? Dry season Rainy season Crossbred

cows Local cows Crossbred calves Local calves D. Breed, Breeding and Reproduction 1. Do you keep crossbred milk cow/s? 1 Yes 2No 2. If yes, when did you start keeping crossbred milk cattle? 3. Source of crossbred heifer(s): 1 Government ranches 2 NGOs 3 Market 4 Relatives 4. Merit and demerit of crossbred cattle compared with local cattle 101 Merit Demerit 1. 2. 3. 5. Which breed of milk cows do you like to keep in the future? 1 Local 2 Crossbred 6. Why do you select it? 7. What is the average age at first calving (year)? a Local b Crossbred c Exotic 8. In which month/season of the year cows

come into heat? Month(s)8 Season Dry Rainy 9. What is the average age at first mating for female (in years)? 1. Local 2. Crossbreeds 10. What is the average age at first effective service for male (in years)? 1. Local 2. Crossbreeds 11. Calving interval of a milking cows? (in months) 1 Local 2. Crossbred 12. What is the average lactation length for milking cows (in months)? 1. Local 2 Crossbred 3 Exotic 13. Do you select superior males and females for breeding? 1 Yes 2 No 14. If yes, how do you select breeding cows? 1. Pedigree history 2 Physical appearances 3 Growth rate 4 Age at first calving 5 Calving interval 6. Mothering ability 7 Others (specify) 15. If yes, how do you select breeding males? 1. Pedigree history 2 Physical appearances 3 Growth rate 4 Service efficiency 5 Combination of the above (mention) 6. Others (specify) 16. Which breed sire mostly you use for natural mating? 1. Crossbred 2

Local 3 Both equally 4 Unknown 17. What is/are your criteria(s) to mate heifers? 1. Age 2 Size 3 Both age and size 4 When ever they manifest estrus94 Decision for extended period of calving interval 18. What type of breeding practices do you use for milk cows? 8 . Codes for months: 1 January 2 Feb 3 March 4 Apr 5 May 6 June 7 July 8 Aug 9 Sept 10 Oct 11. Nov 12 Dec NB: For more than one choice write possible cod 102 1. Natural (bull service) 2 Artificial insemination (AI) 3 Both 19. If you use AI, what is the source of it? 1. Government recruited technicians’ 2 NGO’s 3 Private 4 Others (specify) 20. Which method do you prefer and why? 1. Natural (bull service) 2. Artificial insemination 21. Is there a problem of AI? 1 Yes 2 No 22. If yes, why? 1. No access 2 Unwillingness of AI technicians’ 3 Shortage of liquid nitrogen and semen 4. Others (specify) 23. Do you have your own breeding bull? 1. Yes 2 No 24. If yes, breed type 25. If

yes, how does it give service? 1. Own herd only 2 Own and neighbor herd freely 3 Others (specify) 26. If no, where is your source for the bull? 1. Neighbor 2 Rent from neighbor 3 Bull services (Rent) 4 Others (specify) 27. Is mating seasonal? 1 Yes 2 No 28. If yes, why? 1 Due to feed shortage in some months 2 Planned for heat period and time of calving 3. Other (specify) 29. If your mating is natural as well as seasonal or planned, how cows and bulls are Protected from mating out of the season? 1. Isolation 2 Others (specify) 30. What are the peaks mating months of the year? (Mention in descending order) 1. 2. 3. 31. How long (in years) a milk cow and bull stays in a herd for breeding in their lifetime? Cow Bull 1. Local 2. Cross 32. What is the source of your replacement breeding bull? 1. Own herd 2 Another herd 3 purchase 4 Other (specify) 33. How many calving are most

likely to occur in the cow lifetime? Local 2. Crossbreeds 34. When do you mate the cow after calving (in days)? 1. Local 2 Crossbreeds 35. What is the average number of service per conception? 103 1. Local cows 2. Crossbreed cows 36. Do you practice culling? 1 Yes 2 No 37. If yes, what is the main reason of culling? 1. Disease 2 Age 3 Infertility 4 Low milk yield 5 Financial constraint 6 Feed shortage 7. Others (specify) 38. If you cull milk cattle due to financial constraint, which is your priority for culling? 1. Milking cow 2 Bull 4 Heifer 5 Male calves 6 Female calves 7 Pregnant cow 8. Infertile/cows with low milk yield 9 Others (specify) 39. Of the above you mentioned which breed you mostly cull? 1. Locals Why? 2. Crossbreeds Why? E. Milk cattle Diseases and Treatments 1. Describe major disease you have

experienced in your milk cattle during the last year in order of importance. No Local name of diseases Affected class of Sympt month and milk cattle om of Number of animals treated Vaccinated Cost 10 number & vaccinati animals Frequency on occurrence Blood level9 of Number of died in last year traditional Modern 11 2. What do you do when your animal is sick? 9 . Blood level: 1 local 2 local X exotic 3 back cross to local 4 back cross with exotic 5 advanced crosses (>75%) N.B: for more than one choice please writ the code plus the number of cattle in bracket 10 . Cods for months: 1 January 2 Feb 3 March 4 Apr 5 May 6 June 7 July 8 Aug 9 Sept 10 Oct 11. Nov 12 Dec NB: For more than one choice writ possible cods 11 . Source: a MoA 2 NGOs 3 Private 4 Others NB For more than one choice please write possible cods. 104 1. Keep of waiting 2 Culling 3 Consult veterinarian 4 Others (specify) 3. Do you have access to veterinary services? 1 Yes 2 No 4. If yes, from

where do you get this service? Type of service Source of service Government private NGOs others 1. Vet 2. Paravet 3. Others (specify) 5. If yes, what is the distance of the animal health center/post? 6. Is there a problem with animal health services? 1 Yes 2 No 7. If yes, please mention 8. Do you use any control measures for ecto-parasites of milk cows? 1. Yes 2 No 9. If yes, specify: Method Frequency Cost per treatment/ head 1. 2. 3. 10. If traditional method, specify: 11. How do you control internal parasites? Method Frequency Cost per treatment/ head 1. 2. 3. 12. If

traditional method, specify: 13. Is there a problem of calving difficulties? 1 Yes 2 No 14. If yes: 1 Abortion 2 Still birth 3 Placental retention 4 Combination of them (mention) F. External input services for milk producers 1. Is there a need for credit services? 1 Yes 2 No 105 2. If your answer is no, what is the reason for not getting credit? 3. If yes For how long a credit is given? 4. Are you happy with credit system you are given? 1 Yes 2 No 5. If your answer is no, what should be improved? 6. What are the major sources of information for milk production? 1. BOA (DA) 2 Milk development programs (specify) 3 Neighbor and/or relatives 4. NGO 5 Other (specify) 7. What are the information types? 8. Have you ever participated on milk production training? 1 Yes 2 No 9. If yes,

specify the training type and the institution which organized the training 10. Is there any extension service given for livestock especially milk development? 1. Yes 2 No 11. If yes, source and frequency of visit in the last 12 months? 1. Source 2Frequency 12. Do you think that there is a need for external input (assistance) which helps the milk production? 13. Are you a member of milk collection group/ cooperative? 1 Yes 2 No 14. If yes, benefits and obligations (eg obtain credit, inputs, and guaranteed sales outlet) 15. Are you a member of saving association or group? 1 Yes 2 No 16. If yes, what kind of savings do you have? G. Milk production, consumption, processing and marketing 1. Milk yield and frequency of milking for milk cows (select the possible frequency of milking and indicate the average milk yield)

Period of lactation Time and amount of milk produced 1. Morning Local 2. Mid day Early lactation Mid of lactation Late lactation 106 3. Evening Remark Crossbred Early lactation Mid of lactation Late lactation 2. Type of milking practices 1. Milking without suckling 2 Few suckle before and after milking 3Suckling before milking only 4. Others (specify) 3. Do you practice complete milking practice? 1 Yes 2 No 4. Do you wash udder of milking cows? 1 Yes 2 No 5. Do you milk your animals in the absence (death) of their calves? 1 Yes 2 No 6. If yes, how? 7. What are your milking equipments? 8. How frequently you clean your milking equipment? 1. Once per day 2 Twice per day 3 3 times per day 4 Others (specify) 9. What kind of water you use to clean your milking equipment? Water source Seasons 1. Dry 2. Rainy 3. throughout a year 1.

Tap water 2. Rain 3. Wells 4. Pond 5. River 6. Others (specify) 10. Do you use disinfectants for milk equipment? 1 Yes 2 No 11. If yes, mention the type of disinfectant you use to disinfect 12. What methods do you use to increase the shelf life of milk and milk products? Description Methods12 Average shelf life in days 1. Milk 2. Yoghourt 3. Butter 12 . Methods: 1 Smoking of containers 2 Boiling before collection 3 Salting 4 Others (specify) 107 4. Cheese 5. Ghee 6. Others (specify) 13. Milk and milk product obtained, consumed and sold Type of No of lactating milk yield/day/cow milk cow cows last year Minimum % used for home % used for % consumption Maximum in (when (when months)13 calf feeding of % Milk of Milk processed sold in months) Local Cross 14. How many kg of butter you get from one churning? Type of cow Amount of milk Amount of butter Amount of cheese churned at a time (lt) produced (kg) produced (kg) 1.

Local 2. Crossbred 15. How much butter, yogurt and cheese produced per week (In kg)? (Please underline what you have chosen) Produced used for home consumption Sold Butter Cheese Yogurt 16. At which season/month(s) do you fetch the maximum and minimum price from the sale of milk and milk products? Products Minimum price (birr) Maximum Season and/months price (birr) Season and/months Milk Butter 13 . Codes for months: 1 January 2 Feb 3 March 4 Apr 5 May 6 June 7 July 8 Aug 9 Sept 10 Oct 11. Nov 12 Dec NB: For more than one choice writ possible code 108 Cheese Yogurt 17. What factors affect the price of milk and milk products? 18. Sales of products and prices Description Season 1 (Low price season) Season 2 (High price season) Outlet 114 Outlet 1 Raw milk Buyer type15 Qty/day or week Price/unit Mode of payment16

Distance travelled/day in km Butter Buyer type Qty/day or week Price/unit Mode of payment Distance travelled/day in km Ghee Buyer type17 Qty/day or week Price/unit Mode of payment18 Distance travelled/day in km 14 . Codes for sales outlet: a Farm gate (homestead) b Market place c Delivery to buyer 15 .Codes for buyer type: a Consumer b Trader c Catering shop d Organization (hospital/school/hostel), e. Collection point of Coop enterprise f Others 16 . Code for mode of payment: a Cash b Cash in advance c Credit d Others 17 .Codes for buyer type: a Consumer b Trader c Catering shop d Organization (hospital/school/hostel), e. Collection point of Coop enterprise f Others 18 . Code for mode of payment: a Cash b Cash in advance c Credit d Others 109 19. For what purpose do you mostly use the money that you get from the sale of milk and milk products 1. Farm inputs 2 Food and non-food items 3 House construction 4 Teach children, 5. other 20. Would you mention the

transport cost of milk products (for a double trip of a sell)? 21. Please specify the frequency of selling milk products in a month 22. Is there any period that you have problem of marketing your milk products? 1. Yes 2 No 23. If yes, which months? a Fasting months b In any month of the year, specify 24. Have you ever experienced spoilage of milk and milk products due to lack of market? 1. Yes 2 NO 25. Do you smoke milk vessels? 1 Yes 2 No 26. If yes, what is the purpose of smoking? 27. What are the plants used for smoking milking equipment? 28. Milking hygienic practice Washing a. Wash hands and milk vessels b. Wash udder before milking c. Wash udder before and after milking d No hygiene Use of towel e. Use of individual towel f Use of collective towel g With bare hand 29. Do you process milk? 1 Yes 2 No 30. If yes, what are your reasons to process milk? 31. Shelf life of fermented milk (ergo)

32. Do you use milk for a purpose other than drinking (eg medicinal value?) 1 Yes 2 No 33. If yes, what type of milk for what type of diseases? 34. Do you produce butter? 1 Yes 2 No 35. What type of churn do you use? a Gourd 36. Uses of butter b. Clay pot c. Other a. consumption b For market c ointment d Other (specify) 37. Uses of buttermilk a consumption b For market c. For cottage cheese making d. animals e Other (specify) 38. For how long can you store butter with minimum spoilage? 39. What methods do you use to minimize spoilage of butter? 40. Do you make ghee? 1 Yes 2 No 41. Describe the spices you use to prepare ghee? 42. For how long can you store ghee with minimum spoilage? 110 43. Do you produce cottage cheese? 1 Yes 2 No 44. What type of milk do you use to produce cottage cheese? a. Whole milk b Buttermilk c Both whole milk & buttermilk

45. Amount of whole milk or buttermilk required to produce a kg of cottage cheese 46. Have you ever experienced loss of ayib due to spoilage? 1 Yes 2 No 47. What methods do you use to minimize spoilage of cottage cheese? 48. What other(s) traditional milk products do you produce? 49. If no, why? If it is because of lack of such milk, would you consume if such milk is available? 1. Yes 2 No 50. How is milk consumed? a In its raw state b After souring c After boiling 51. Which milk products do you use for family consumption? Milk products Prioritize/Rank Fresh milk 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Fermented milk Buttermilk Cottage cheese Ghee Metata ayib Zure Whey 52. If yes, who has the priority in the household? a Children b Wife c Husband d Others (specify) 53. Did you encounter sickness due to consumption of contaminated milk? 1 Yes 2 No 54. What are the major problems with respect to milk production, processing and marketing of milk

products? (Prioritize) 55. What is the trend of milk production in the last 5 years? 1. Increased 2 Decreased 3 No change 56. In what way shall the government contribute to bring development in milk enterprise? 111 H. gender and labour source 1. Which gender plays a great role in milk production? 1 Male 2 Female 3 Both almost equally 2. -Do you use daily labourers for milk production? 1 Yes 2 No 3. If no, reasons for not hiring labour for milk production Have enough labour – 1Too expensive – 2 No labour for hiring – 3 other specify – 4 4. Rank19 the responsibility of the household for the following activities Activities Adult Adult Children Children Other male Male female members female Herding Cleaning sheds Caring for suckler calves Feeding and watering Milking Milk processing Selling products Breeding decisions Purchasing and selling Other

(specify) 2 Rank: a. More b Medium c Low d Not at all e Others (specify) 112 family Hired labor